ParkW CC-1/FP-CS 900314DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
RE:
COPPELL PUBLIC WORK~
MEMORANDUM
March 14, 1990
Gary Si,b, Director of Planning and~unity
_~/ I
Steve Goram,~{ector of Public Wor~ ]
Russell Doyl~ity Engineer
Park West Commerce Center, Final Plat
(Planning & Zoning Meeting Date: March 15,
Services
1990)
Public Works staff has reviewed the above referenced plans and we have the
following comments:
The final construction plans that we have received for review continue to
be incomplete. However, we have continued working faithfully with Mr.
Davis, the Project Manager, and have reviewed and responded to him on
incremental sections of design plans he has made available to us. You have
been provided with previous copies of Engineering DRC checklist comments
and letters.
2o
We are providing another marked up plan to Mr. Davis including our
comments, along with a letter regarding the Floodplain Management Ordinance
and Compliance with it. We will provide you with a copy of said letter.
3. Storm sewer plans and profiles have not been submitted as of this date.
4e
Floodplain Hydraulic Study has not been submitted as of this date (see
attached {this is of special concern} letter from FEMA on property dated
August 18, 1987).
As per Richard Diane, codes, covenants and restrictions are not acceptable
because they do not show the City has ability to access for common area.
Sidewalks are requ/red as per the Subdivision Ordinance, Public Works staff
does not favor the sidewalk variance. If the applicant is requesting a
variance, it must be by letter of request and not just a note on the plat,
etc. We are responding to messers Davis, Pritchett, and Tucker on this
matter.
We still have concerns about the sanitary sewer out-fall. As per attached
letter from Mr. Davis, dated March 2, 1990, the Developer does not intend
to participate in any offsite sanitary sewer improvement. The 12" sewer
is almost at capacity now and a full development of a 24" or larger pipe
will be required.
A minimum of 20 feet utility easements are required.
As you had requested from Mr. Davis during the March 6, 1990, DRC meeting,
it is our understanding there will be a note on the final plat stating that
... "all applicable development fees must be paid as each lot develops...".
10.
The street name of Southwestern Drive within this property and the one used
for the extension of said street to the west are inconsistent. Regardless
of the name used, we recommend that the street name be consistent
throughout. The street name should be a decision item and Police and Fire
should give recommendations.
11.
Attached, please find a copy of Engineering Division comments provided
during the February 27, 1990 and reused as our present comments as of
today.
12.
We have no objection to this plat and recomend approval with the condition
that final construction plans be approved within 90 days of approval of
final plat by the City Council. No construction shall
approved construction plans. No construction will take place~adequate
ingress and egress and any improvement be constructed toinsure~-he health,
safety and welfare of the public.
As noted above, there are a myriad of items that have not been addressed at this
time and remain as our comment on this project. As mentioned above, we will
continue to work with the applicant. Depending upon the Planning and Zoning
Commissioner's determination on this plat, we would recommend that any approval
and recommendations to the City Council by the P & Z Commission contain a clear
conditional or subject to statement based on the completion of the construction
drawings including the Floodplain Development Permit.
If you have any questions, please let us know.
SGG /RRD/MSD/bb
xc: Don Davis, Consulting Engineers
Mike Tucker, Prentiss Properties
PARKWEST.MSD