Sherrill Acre/SPAm-DR000928 City of Coppell
Development Review Committee Comments
Planning Department
SHERRILL ACRES ADDITION, SITE PLAN
AMENDMENT AND
FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1
S. OF BELTLINE, EAST OF MAC ARTHUR
DRC Date: September 28t~ and October 5th, 2000
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting: October 19, 2000
City Council Meeting: November 14, 2000
PLAT COMMENTS:
Plat must be submitted on black line verses blueline paper
If the existing median is to be accessed by this use then the mutual access
easement would have to be extended off-site to the west, by separate instrument.
Label the existing 30' x 85' utility easement at the north east comer of the site.
SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
1. Need to dimension typical parking space.
2. Consider rotating the monument sign 90 degrees to be more visible from Belt Line
Road.
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
Need to either label landscape materials more specifically and/or add symbols to
Landscape Data Table. Several lines are "floating".
An adequate amount of landscaping appears to be provided on the Landscape
Plan, however the tabulations appear in error.
· Need to add column to Landscape Tabulations indicating the amount of
landscaping actually PROVIDED in each of the categories. Are the required
and provided square footages exactly the same?
· The perimeter landscaping required (15' front, 10' side and rear) appears to
calculate as 7,751 while the linear footage (minus the drives) is closer to 697
feet.
· Required Non-vehicular and interior landscaping were calculated correctly in
the table, however, how much is being provided needs to be defined.
Page 1 of 2
ELEVATIONS:
1. Need to provide dimensions for the building, especially to the top of the roof.
2. What is the roof slope above the defined 6 to 12? The east and west the
elevations of the roof appear massive and completely out of scale with the rest of
the building. A roof plan would assist in the analysis of these elevations.
Note:
A.
Bo
Please revise plats, site plans, landscape plans, and building elevations based on staff
recommendations. ShouM applicant disagree with staff comments please provide
reasons why staff recommendations should not be followed when you attend the October
Sth Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting.
Each applicant will bring two new sets of revised plats and plans to the October 5th
DRC meeting. Applicants will be asked to show, explain, and defend any revision. A
representative for this project is required to attend the meeting.
Applicant will have till noon Tuesday, October 10th to resubmit sixteen (16) folded
copies of revised plans and three (3) reduced paper copies (8 1/2 X 11) of each exhibit
to the Planning Department
Page 2 of 2