Ferguson letterSanuary 25, 2002
E-md:
kt'argtmonl~ nova kev.eom
Mr. Gary Sieb, Director
Planning and Community Services
255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas 7~019
Re: Special Use Permit and Certificate of Oecupan~ Requirements
Dear Mr. Sieb:
This letter is intended confirm my discussions w/th each of Andrea Roy of the Cily of
Coppell Planning and Zoning Commission and Greg Jones, the City of Coppell Building
Manager, regarding the City of Coppell's Special Use Permit and Certificate of Occupancy
requirements in connection with the proposed purchase of the ass~ (the "Purchase") related to
the CPs Clubhouse Restaurant business (the "Business") located at Town0aks Centre, Coppell,
Dallas County, Texas, and continued operation of CJ's Clubhouse ss a r~staurant and bar under
the same name as it is currently operated.
On January 8, 2002, I asked Ms. Roy what actions, if any, the purchaser of the Business
needed to undertake with respect m the Special Use Permit issued by the City of Coppell and
pursuant to which the CJ's Clul~ouse Restaurant operal~L Specifically, I asked Mi. Roy if an
amendment to the Special Use Permit related to CJ's Clubhouse was required m connection with
Ms. Roy informed me tha~ aftra discussing this mawr w/th the city of Coppen Planning
Director, thc Planning Director determined that the City Ordinances governing the amendments
of Special Use Permits and the transfers of businesses operating on property subject to a Special
Usc Permit did not apply to the Purchase. The applicable City of Coppell ordinance provides, in
part, that "in the event ownership of a property having a zoning classification of Special Usc
Permit for a restaurant, is transferred from the original grantee to a new owner or new operator,
thc Planning and Zoning Commission for thc City Council may initiate a zoning change..."
b~~ca~According to Ms. Roy, the Planning Dir~ct0r a.grex;d that this provision did not appl.y
(i) the owaership of the property ~aaving a zoning classification of Special Use Permit
for a restaurant" would not be "transferred and (u) ,,~ ,,,,~,,-,, ~, ..... , ,~ ~u us .h ~ /.
, J .1 -- ' ~ ' ' '?- ~ --:-- __~-2--L :_ iL.'- :---~--~.,~ ~, +~a .-~-..~_ ~ '
Mr. Gary
January 2~, 2002
Page 2
Ms. Roy also stat~ that the Planning Director m. ade a _determination _fl? as long as ~e
us~ by th~ n~w operamr,/conforms to ~e existing use prior to the transacuon O.e., no change m
name, fearing, hours of opcratio~ signage), the city would requir~ no revision of the Special Use.
......... e .........J, , ,,~_,,,..~ Die-'tot also d~t~,,,i-~d &at wh~i¢ ,,,, c.I~ii~ m-
' "- ' '"' ~,a-C. ha~ ...... -' ....
~Cr_~k_d~' ,~,¢ ........ th,- r~,~l r.~r~,,-'=~,-~'-;,, ig C~g'-:.,'q.'-'-~,,,. ~ 1: Lk.C t,~, h~, m~, U~"?-,~LLUU,. ....
At Ms. Roy's direction, on january 8, 2002, I also spoke with thc City of Coppcll
Building Manager, Oreg Sones, regarding thc effect of the Purchase on the Certificate of
Occupancy issucd by the City of Coppcll to CJ's Clubhouse. Mr. Jones informed mc that thc
Purchase would lmv¢ no impact on the ~cisting Certificate of Occupancy because the Purchase
would involve no chsngc in thc operation of C$'s Clubhouse. Mr..Jones also informed me that if
the new ol~rator of CJ's Clubhouse were to change the signage or ~ld awnings, for exm~plc, a
new Certificate of Occupancy would i~ required.
1 ~rite'this letter only to confirm our understanding of the City's position with respect to
the Special Usc Permit and Ccrtificatc of Occupancy rcquircmcnB in connection with thc
Purchase prior m the purchaser's consummation of thc tnmsactions contemplate~l by the
Purchase. As I am surc you can understand, any inaccuracies or misunderstanding with resp~t
to thc City's position concerning thc Special Use Permit and Certificate of' Occupancy would
severely impact thc purchaser's operation of the Business. Thus, if this letter is inaccurate in any
respect, please inform us of any such inaccuracy as soon as possible by calling mc at (972) 628-
3662. Thank you very much for your assistance with this matter.
Sincerely,
L. Kyle Ferguson
LKF:nc
£0/£0'd SP :~ i~00~.-0~-t,~£
According to Ms. Roy, the Planning Director agreed that this provision did not apply because (i)'the
ownership of the property "having a zoning classification of Special Use Permit for a restaurant" would not
be "transferred" and (ii) all conditions of the existing restaurant use will remain in effect under the new
management, with no change to the hours of operation, business name, seating, signage, or any other
distinguishing changes similar in character. Additionally, Ms. Roy stated that if modifications of'this type
are made to restaurant, a revision to the Special Use permit would be required.