Loading...
NCH letter proposing THEIR planNCH CORPORATE OFFICES 2727 CHEMSEARCH BLVD. IRVING, TEXAS 75062 March 23, 1994 BY FAX Ms. Marsha Tunnell, Chair Planning and Zoning Commission c/o Gary Sieb, Director of Planning CITY OF COPPELL, TEXAS 255 Parkway Blvd. Coppell, TX 75019 Re: Recommendations from the Comprehensive Plan Update NAR NAR 2 4 l§94'/ Item 6. Non-Conforming 2F-9 to remain 2F-9 and MF-2 along Coppell Road Dear Ms. Tunnelh In an effort to respond to the testimony heard during the March 14 public hearing and at the re- quest of the commission, NCH has endeavored to work out with city staff a revision of our pro- posal. It is my belief we have been successful in this effort and look forward to presenting the results to you at the March 24 meeting. We respectfully request that the Planning and Zoning Commission vote to recommend our plan to the city council. Our plan, as it did last week, attempts to respect and respond to the concerns of our neighbors, while at the same time allowing us to retain both our MF-2 and LI zoning, but in different loca- tions. If approved by the city, we are still committing ourselves to providing the fifty foot setback buffer, landscaping, sidewalk and screening wall we showed last week, where either Multifamily or Industrial development borders on Coppell Road. Additionally, we have made the following refinements, responding to the new public comments: Reduced by 60% the MF-2 frontage on Coppell Road by shifting it southward and westward, deeper into our property. By doing this, the MF-2 is now no longer "across the street" from Single Family zoned land on Coppell Road. The new, smaller frontage is entirely across from land zoned "Commercial". This plan orients the future MF development to Freeport Parkway, thereby eliminating any perceived traffic impact to Coppell Road. We agree that the MF will have no more than one(l) driveway access to Coppell Road, which could be blocked off to everyday traffic with a Fire Dept. approved "crash gate", only to be used in case of emergency. All major entries would be from the west off of streets designed to handle the traffic. Where our property is adjacent to the ~Loch Lane" residential, on our side of Coppell Road, we will provide for an increased, thirty (30) foot landscaped setback and an eight (8) foot screening wall. Please consider this letter as evidence of our commitment to follow through on all we have promised herein, should the city concur with our plan. TELEPHONE A/C 214-438-0211, TELEX 73336, CABLE NATCHEM IRVING, FAX A/C 214-438-0100 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 152170, IRVING, TX 75015-2170 Ms. Marsha Tunnell Planning and Zoning Commission March 23, 1994 Page Two However, let me address the other two alternatives which were proposed last week. NCH Corpo- ration does not agree with and does not desire zoning which would refle~ either the proposed plan showing single Family on our property or the "all Industrial" scheme mentioned by some. We would like to make it clear that with either of these zonings, we Would no longer commit our- selves to any of the representations made herein regarding additional buffering, landscaping and screenint~. We say this only to relieve any misunderstandings on this issue. We have continued to make every effort to communicate with the interested homeowner groups, and other individuals with which we talked at the meeting, and feel that most are comfortable with our plan, once they understand it. We look forward to presenting this to you in greater detail at your March 24 meeting, and answer- ing any questions you should have. Thank you. Sincerely, NCH CORPORATION Don Moulton, P.E. Director of Corporate Engineering CC: Mr. Curtis Young Peckham & Young 8445 Freeport Parkway, Ste 660 Irving, TX 75063 Robert L. Blumenthal, Esquire Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201