Warren Cross/FP-AG 931214'~c~ wi~ ^ h~t!~ Future
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
I}~cemher 14; 1993
ITEM NUMBER
ITEM CAPTION:
Consideration and approval of a (Secondary) Final Plat for Warren Crossing located at the northwest corner of
Beverly Drive and Warren Crossing, at the request of Winklemann & Associates.
SUBMITTED BY:
STAFF(~IEP.: Gary 1,_
', Director of Ha,ming & Comm. Services
OTHER REP.:
DATE:
EVALUATION OF ITEM:
Date of P&Z Meeting: November 18, 1993
Decision of P&Z Commission: Approval (6-1) with Commissioners Alexander, Wheeler, Tunnell, Meador,
Redford and Hildebrand voting in favor of approval and Commissioner Thompson voting against approval.
The following conditions apply:
1. the drainage easement should be a minimum of 50 feet wide to allow for a street in the future, and
2. all garages must be side entry.
BUDGET AMT. ~
AMT. +/- BUDGET
COMMENTS:
AMT. ESTIMATED
FINANCIAL REVIEW BY ~~
~ c~: ~/~,¥//
LEGAL REVIEW BY:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM REVISED 2/93
REVIEWED BY CM:
CASE #:
P & Z HEARING DATE:
C. C. HEARING DATE:
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Warren Crossing (Secondary) Final Plat
November 18, 1993
December 14, 1993
LOCATION:
The northwest corner of Beverly Drive and Warren Crossing.
SIZE OF AREA: 4.42 acres of land
CURRENT
ZONING: MF-2
REQUEST:
Approval of a (secondary) final plat.
APPLICANT:
HISTORY:
Mr. E. R. Warren
2215 Lakeland Drive
Carrollton, TX 75006
Represented by:
Winklemann & Associates
Eugene Middleton
12800 Hillcrest Road
Suite 200
Dallas, TX 75230
No zoning or platting history on this tract.
TRANSPORTATION:
Subject site is located near a major arterial, MacArthur Blvd. which is
classified as a six-lane divided (P6D) roadway.
Item 13
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North
South
East
West
Single family use; SF-0 zoning
Single family use; PD-SF zoning
Single family use; PD-SF zoning
Single family use; SF-0 zoning
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Although the land area adjacent to the subject site was intended to be
developed as medium and high density (Multi-family) according to the
plan, the area was not developed in this manner. Much of the area that
was zoned as multi-family wa~ rezoned to single-family within the last two
years.
ANALYSIS:
As discussed in the zoning case, ZC-550, this parcel is the last of the sites
in this area which should be rezoned based on its surrounding uses. The
floodplain/floodway should be shown as an easement on the north side of
Lot 7. In the event that Lot 7 is ever subdivided, the proposed 30 foot
mutual access and drainage easement should be a minimum of 50 feet
wide to allow for a street in the future.
The applicant has requested a variance to the alley requirement, so that
the developer is not required to install a alley along the rear of the lots.
Staff supports the final plat with the stipulation that all of the lots be side
entry versus front entry.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Approve the final plat request.
2) Deny the final plat request.
3) Modify the final plat request.
ATFACHMENTS: 1) Final Plat
warrencr, fp