DRC commentsCOFFELL
Pro,ct ID SPA-03-0072
Address 300 Royal Ln
CITY OF GOPPELL
DRC REPORT
Pm~ectName
COFPELL
Fm~pofl Norlh, Lo! 3, BIoO~ 3 (D~xas)
Project Type
Application Date
Case Manafter
Proiect Descriptiee
Site Plan Approval
9/17/2003
Matt Steer
To allow the development of an approximate 167.093 square-foot office/warehouse on 12.14 acres
1 of 2
Agency Reviewed By Review Date
Building Inspection Greg Jones 9/2512003
Electdc and Gas Jeff Curry 9/25/2003
Engineering Teresa Turner 9/25/2003
Fire Administration Travis Crump 9/25/2003
Parks and Recreation John Elias 9/26/2003
Comments
No comments received
Site Plan Acceptable
1. Indicate dimensions, storage lengths, transitions, etc. for
the proposed northbound left turn lane. Additional signage
may be required.
2. No encroachments or structures can be located within the
limits of the floodplain.
3. Grading and Drainage Area information should be
located on separate sheets.
4. It appears that the curb return for the drive on Royal Lane
is in conflict with the existing recessed curb inlet. The curb
return cannot begin within the pavement transition of the
recessed inlet.
5. All water and sanitary sewer connections must be made
via bore.
6. More clearly show all existing driveways across from this
property. Driveways must either align of be offset a minimum
of 125',
7. Indicate the driveway turning radii.
8. Indicate the primary truck entrance,
No Comments Received
1. Tree retribution calculations on the plans are incorrect.
2. Correct tree retribution calculations are as follows:
Total trees on site 1832" (DBH)
Trees removed 1549" (DBH)
Trees preserved 283" (DBH)
Preservation credit 239" (DBH) 15%
Landscape credit 318"
NET RETRIBUTION 992"
A contribution to the City of Coppell Reforestation and
Natural Areas Fund in the amount of $99. 200.00 will be
required.
COFFELL
Agency
Planning Department
Reviewed By
Matt Steer
CITY OF COPPELI..
DRC REPORT
Review Date
9/25/2003
COFFELL
Corem®nfs
General Gomments:
1. Please show building fronting Royal Lane as Royal Lane
serves as a Major Arterial, and consider increasing the
volume of the front to better define the entrance.
2. Submit color renderings of the elevations for review at the
DRC meeting.
3. Ensure consistency between easements being platted and
what is shown on site plan.
4. Show screened refuse location on plans.
5. Spell check the set of plans (8' 0" Heigh).
Site Plan Specific:
1. Please include the Site Data Table as follows:
a. Existing zoning,
b. Proposed use,
c. Square footage of each proposed use,
d. Building area (gross square footage),
e. Building height,
f. Required and provided parking per each use,
g. Proposed lot coverage, and
h. Floor Area Ratio.
2. Please show the existing zoning districts adjacent to the
property.
3. Check location of sign vs. proposed landscaping. Submit
sign rendering with dimensions and roatedals to be used.
4. Show dimensions of proposed curb cuts along with the
inside and outside turning radii (minimum 30' inside and 54'
outside),
5, Is this all two way traffic within the site?
6. Stained and stamped concrete required at each
ingress/egress point.
7. Ensure compliance with Texas Accessibility Code for all
proposed sidewalks.
8. There is a sidewalk leading up to the building, and on the
west elevation there is no door shown.
9, Please coordinate with Engineering for the median and
curb cuts.
Landscape Plan Specific:
1. Show proposed elevations on the proposed berms shown
just within the property lines on landscape plan,
2. Please include a landscape island for every 15 parking
spaces (minimum 150 square feet).
3. Add three trees to north property line.
COPPELL
Project ID RP~03~073
Address 300 Royal Ln
CITY OF COPPELL
DRC REPORT
Project Name
COPPELL
Fmopo~ Nodh, Lot 3~ Block 3 Addition (Dexas)
Prolect Type
ApPlication Date
Case Manau~r
Project Descrlotion
Replat
9/17/2003
Matt Steer
To allow the development of an approximate 167,093 square*foot office~Narehouse on 12,14 acres located at the northwest
corner of Creekview and Royal Lane, at the request of Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers.
Agency
Building Inspection
Electric and Gas
Engineering
1 of 2
Reviewed By Review Date
Greg Jones 9/25/2003
Jeff Curry 9/25/2003
Teresa Turner 9/25/2003
No Comments Received
Plat Unacceptable, please contact Jeff Curry to discuss
easement requirements.
1. Include a fire lane data table,
2. Label the limits of the floodplain.
3. Additional easements may be required during
engineering review.
4. Add the following note to the plat: "Sidewalks will be
constructed et the expense of the property owner when
deemed necessary by the City Engineer."
5. Add the following note to the plat: 'The City of Coppelt will
have no responsibility for maintenance of the
floodplair~loodway areas as shown hereon; however, the C~
does have the authority to regulate activity in the
floodway/floodplain as per the City's Floodplain Ordinance.
The maintenance of these areas shall be the sole
responsibility of the individual owner(s) adjacent to said
areas. These areas are to remain free of improvements that
may obstruct the flow of stormwater and protected from
potential erosion by the owners. No fences will be allowed in
the floodplain, along with any other structures as per the
City's Floodplain Ordinance."
Fire Administration Travis Crump 9/25/2003 No Comments Received
Parks and Recreation John Elias 9/26/2003 No Comments.
COI 'I 'ELL
Agency
Planning Department
Reviewed By
Matt Steer
CITY OF COPPELL
DRC REPORT
Review Date
9/25/2003
COFFELL
Comments
1. Please show the number of acres in the title block.
2. Please depict Creekview on the Vicinity Map.
3. The TP&L Easement does not show width. It encroaches
within the Firelane Easement to be dedicated by this plat.
4. There is a 15' Oncer Electdc Delivery Company
Easement shown on the plat. Once acceptable to the
Electric and Gas Agency, it should be designated as an
Electric Easement (not specifying a specific company as it
might change in the future).
5. Please include the boundaries of FEMA defined flood
plain of Cottonwood Branch.
6. Cottonwood Branch should be labeled properly (possibly
with arrows indicating where it is).
7. Depict the minimum finished floor elevations on the plat.
8. AT&T signature block should be revised to Comcast.
9. Is it acceptable surveying practice to have a "point in creek
- not set"?
10. Please submit an additional $35 to make up what was
lacking on the platting fees ($555 required and $520 initially
submitted),