Loading...
Prelim. Grading PlanNotes: 1. Contractor must insure that no slopes exceed 4-:1 2. Contractor must insure that all areas will be graded to drain. 5. Contractor must field verify all existing utilities prior to construction. 4-. Contractor must notify engineer of any discrepancies. 5/8-INCH IRON ROD FOUND W.LLIAM F. CALLEJO, TRUSTEE (VOL. 80004-, PO. 1855) "---. TC 5 / BUTL TNG i BUILD 1 /ir ./ 506.39 507.32 b 508/ 506.02 iTC 511.72- TQ 512.1 ~ TC 512.10. .... TC 511.72. W TC 512.1C TC 511.72' TC 512.10- TC~512.10 TO,, 511.72 C 512 512.50 516 2.2~7 TC 515.52. 10,23 4~510.44 510.50 51'*WI~j'']AMU.(/J,~L- F. CALLEJO TRUSTEE 80004-, PG.' 18.35) .92 i10.58 512.10 511.72 512.10 511.30 510.58 -DR 510.22 ~..72 510.58 '512.29 511.68 512.24 510.58 DR 510.26 WU_LIAM F. CALLEJO, TRUSTEE 512.~60L. 80004, PG. 1835) 2.48 511.30 511.81 512.95 i12.51 514.20 IRON FOUND ,24 7,33 i 100 50 0 100 SCALE 1"=100' FEET EARTHWORK NOTES 1. Site Preparation All trees, stumps, brush, abandoned structures, roots, vegetation, rubbish and any other undesirable matter should be properly removed end disposed of. 2. Compacting Area to be Riled All areas to be filled should be disced or bladed until uniform and free from large clods, brought to a moisture content between opt[mum and five (5) percentage points above the optimum moisture vo.lue for claye~ soils and between optimum to +3 percentage points fo.r si,lty cloy soils and soil containing limestone fragments and compacted to between 95 and 100 percent of optimum density in accordance with ASTU D 698. 3. Fill Materials Off-site materials to used for fill should be approved by the Soils Engineer. There should be no roots, yes.et, orion or any other undesirable matter in the soil, end no rocks larger than six (6) inches i,n diameter. 4. Depth of Mixing of Fill Layers The fill material should be placed in level, uniform layers, which, when compacted, should hove a moisture content end density conforming to the stipulations coiled for herein. Each layer should be thoroughly mixed during the spreading to insure the uniformity of the layer. The fill thmkness should not exceed lO-inch loose lifts. 5. Rock There should be no Fock incorpoFoted within the ~11 which exceeds six (6) inches` in its greatest dimension, and no large rocks wild be permitted within twelve (12) inches of the finished subgrade. 6. Moisture Content Prior to and in conjunct;on with the compacting operation, each layer should be brought to the proper moisture content as determi,ned by ASllvl D 698, within plus or minus three (3) percentage points of optimum for fill containing limestone rock pieces and between optimum and five percentage points above the optimum for clayey soils. Amount of compaction After each layer has been properly placed, mixed and spread, it should be thoroughly compacted to between 95 and 100 percent of Standard Proctor Density os determined by ASTM D 698. Compaction of Fill Layers Compaction equipment should be of such design that it will be one to compact the fill to the specified density. Compaction of each layer shall be continuous over its entire oreo. 10. Density Tests Field Density tests should be made by the Soils Engineer or his representative. Density tests should be taken in the compacted material below the disturbed surface. After each layer of fill, compaction tests, as necessary, should be made by the Soils Engineer, If the moterio,ls foil to meet the density specified, the course should be reworked as necessary to obtain the specified compaction. Supervision Supervision by the Soils Engineer should be of such continuity during the grading operation that he con certify that oli cut and filled areas were graded in accordance with the accepted specifications. 11. DIRT SUMMARY: CUT VOLUME: (LESS 15% SHRINKAGE) FILL VOLUME: NET DIFFERENCE: 178,000 CY 151,500 CY 155,000 CY 1,700 CY IMPORT Slope Control Embankment slopes should not be steeper than a ratio of three (5) horizontal to one (1) vertical for .el.thor fill or cut slopes. Any slope, existing or proposed, steeper than three (3) feet in height should incorporate stabilization methods to include erosion control, embankment stabilization and other slope control measures as required by the slope control specialist. LEGEND 500-- EXISTiNG 5' CONTOUR iNTERVAL 493--- EXISllNG 1' CONTOUR INTERVAL PROPOSED P514.11~ TOP OF PAVEMENT FG515,26---,~ F1ELD GRADE VAt:! EY GUTTER 515.26~ EXISTiNG GRO,UND HP HIGH POINT LP LOW POINT ..... SCALE PRELIMINARY,,, GRADING PLAN PROJEcTNo. ... COPPELL TRADE CENTER S8409 ............ ~4O N, ~ E~r~,~A F, SUITE414 " I II DRANNN PJF D,,,~[~,J,A~, ~ 75.206 PLATE DATE 11/01/04. TET. e?4.~Z~-I180*FAxe14~Z&.6580 CITY OF COPPELL EMAJL"cm,-~ .~c.'¢r~.co-n DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS NO. REVISIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION BY DATE '40. REVISIONS DURING PLAN REVIEW BY DATE 0w~ F~LE Se,mgaAS.PRO oFXX I I I I I I mm ri II mill II II lin II u II nm I~ I I I · I I I I I I II I I I I lmm III I I ~ed Bec 3~ 3-a 07 3] 2934 ' m III ~ 11 II II IIII Bill I I I IIIIII I I II I