E-mail w/engineer re platMatt Steer - Fwd: Fellowship of Las Colinas Addition Page 1 I
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Matt Steer
Inewman@g rahamcivil.com
4/13~2004 10:22:44 AM
Fwd: Fellowship of Las Colinas Addition
Mr. Newman,
Where do you stand on the plat signatures? I know you were going to send it to Grapevine first for
signatures, then over to us. You had questions regarding the Utility Signature Blocks. We default to the
City of Grapevine requirements in regards to these. Let me know if you have any additional questions.
Thanks,
Matt
Mr. Newman,
I have received Engineering's comments. They said it looks okay.
Please revise the signature blocks to reflect "Director of Planning" and not "Director of Planning and
Community Services".
Thanks,
Matt
Mr. Newman,
I have forwarded the plat to the Engineering Department. I will get back to you with their comments as
soon as possible.
Thanks for your patience,
Matt Steer
>>> Matt Steer 2/2612004 10:36:37 AM >>>
Mr. Newman,
We received the Fellowship of Las Co#nas Addition on Monday (2-23-04).
I have reviewed the history of the plat, and will double check it with
our Engineering Department today. I understand that the majority of the
plat is within Grapevine; therefore, it should be signed by them first.
Andrea Roy was the previous Planner that reviewed the case, and she has
brought me up to speed. Later on today, I will let you know if any
minor adjustments are needed after I meet with our Engineering
Department.
Thanks,
Matt Steer, City Planner
City of Coppell
Matt Steer - Fwd: Fellowship of Las Colinas Addition Page 1 I
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Mr. Newman,
Matt Steer
Inewman@grahamciviL corn
5/25/2004 4:47:03 PM
Fwd: Fellowship of Las Colinas Addition
Where do we stand on the plat signatures?
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Matt Steer
City Planner
City of Coppeil
>>> Matt Steer 4/13/2004 10:22:44 AM >>>
Mr. Newman,
Where do you stand on the plat signatures? I know you were going to s~end it to Grapevine first for
signatures, then over to us. You had questions regarding the Utility Sigdature Blocks. We default to the
City of Grapevine requirements in regards to these. Let me know if you have any additional questions.
Thanks,
Matt
Mr. Newman,
I have received Engineedng's comments. They said it looks okay.
Please revise the signature blocks to reflect "Director of Planning" and nbt "Director of Planning and
Community Services",
Thanks,
Matt
Mr. Newman,
I have forwarded the plat to the Engineering DepartmenL I will get back ko you with their comments as
soon as possible.
Thanks for your patience,
Matt Steer
>>> Matt Steer 2/26/2004 10:36:37 AM >>>
Mr. Newman,
We received the Fellowship of Las Co#nas Addition on Monday (2-23-0~.
I have reviewed the history of the plat, and will double check it with
our Engineefing Department today, l understand that the majority of the
plat is within Grapevine; therefore, it should be signed by them first.
Andrea Roy was the previous Planner that reviewed the case, and she YiPs
brought me up to speed. Later on today, I will let you know if any
minor adjustments are needed after I meet with our Engineering
Department.
Matt Steer - Fwd: Fellowship of Las Cotinas Addition , Page 2 ~
Thanks,
Matt Steer, City Planner
City of Coppell
Matt Steer - Message status - undeliverable , Page I I
From: <Mailer-Daemonl~mail.ci.coppell.tx.us>
To: <MSTEER@ci.coppell.tx. us>
Date: 5/25/2004 4:48:56 PM
Subject: Message status - undeliverable
The message that you sent was undeliverable to the following:
Inewman@grahamcivil.com (550 5.1.1 <lnewman@grahamcivil. Com>... User unknown)
Possibly truncated original message follows: