Applic. response-DRC commentsKarch 8, 2005
No.: 1628-05.034
Mr. Gary Sieb
Planning Department
CITY OF COPPELL
255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas 75019
Re:
16.8 ACRE SITE
Beltline Road @ Airline Drive
Coppell, Texas
Dear Mr. Slab:
/
This letter is to notify you that the enclosed Concept Plans have been revised in
accordance with your February 25, 2005 Review Memorandum. The following items
have been addressed as per the referenced review: !
GENERAL COMMENTS - BUILDING INSPECTION
· Show the location FDC's on the drawings.
Response: Done
· Provide verification from the adjacent property o'
development to connect to the adjacent property'=
Response: The developer has contacted the ~
letter of permission will be provided if an agra
· The screening wall cannot be located in the drain
Response: The screening wall was moved to I~
the existing 10' drainage easement.
· The City anticipates beginning construction of a n
this site in mid 2005. There will need to be coordi~
and the City pertaining to taps, location, and timin
Response: A note has been added to the pla~
timing of construction will be coordinated with
inch water main.
vner to the west that allows this
fire line.
idjacent property owner and a
=.ment can be made.
~ge easement.
e 15-ftnorth of the centerline of
;w 16-inch water line adjacent to
~ation between this development
s stating the tap locations and
the installation of the future 16-
Mr. Gary Sieb
March 8, 2005
Page 2
SHEET C1.1 /
· Provide manholes where private storm drains meet public sttrm
Response: Done
· Provide profiles of storm drain including any crossing utilities
Response: Profiles of the proposed storm sewer will bE
engineering review.
· The location of the inlet at the northeast corner of the propert
the requested mutual access easement.
Response: Done
SHEET A-1.0
· The proposed 50' driveway exceeds the maximum 40' driv~
Ordinance. You should consider moving the median noses to
driveway.
Response: The median noses were realigned to the cenb
with a maximum 60-ft. median opening.
GENERAL COMMENTS - FIRE ADMINISTRATION
· Fire hydrants in 'service court' must be 3'-6' from fire lane.
Response: Done
· Fire hydrants in 'service court' must be protected by bollards
Response: Done
· Provide fire lane from one of the openings of the mutual acc~
Response: It was determined to eliminate this commenl
· Fire hydrants required every 300' - inadequate along north
Response: One fire hydrant was added along the nc
requirements.
drains.
~rovided in the permit set for
will need to be relocated due to
,way allowed by the Subdivision
align the median opening with the
~rline of the proposed driveway
s specified in Engineering details.
~ss easement to the west.
at the DRC meeting.
lane.
rth fire lane to meet spacing
Mr. Gary Sieb
March 8, 2005
Page 3
GENERAL COMMENTS - LANDSCAPE PLAN
· A friendly reminder all transplanted materials must retain a h~althy, growing condition.
Response: Done
· Indicate flowering and ornamental evergreen species.
Response: Done
· Need sealed landscape plans.
Response: Done
GENERAL COMMENTS - REPLAT
Please contact Jeff Curry at 972-570-4126 to discuss easerr ent requirements.
Response: Jeff Curry has been contacted about the proj ;ct. A copy of the plat has also
been mailed to him for his review.
a mutual access easement for the property to the nqrth at the northern driveway.
Provide
Response: Done
Add the floodplain signature block to the plat.
Response: Done
Only 10-foot of the 20-foot Utility and Drainage Easement de ,dicated by Volume 90218, page
3264 can be abandoned. There still must be a minimum 20-f(,ot Utility and Drainage Easement
centered over the existing 72" RCP.
Response: The existing easements are no longerto be a~andoned. The screening wall
has been moved 15-ft north of the center#ne of the existing 10' drainage easement forthe
72" RCP.
Provide access from mutual access easement from the westI
Response: It was determined to eliminate this commen~at the DRC meeting.
TXU Gas is now Atmos Energy
Response: Done
Mr. Gary Sieb
March 8, 2005
Page 4
· State reason for Replat and shade on plat document.
Response: Done
· Need standard Replat signature block
Response: Done
· Identify Block in Utility/Drainage easement abandonment stal
Response: The easement is no longer being abandoned.
If you have any questions or need any additional informatic
convenience.
RCS/sit
1628-271
ement.
n, please call at your earliest
Ryar C. Safford
cc: Stan Conway - Majestic Realty
Kyle McCullah - Hardy McCullah/MLM Architects