CC approval on 9/13/05AGENDA REQUEST FORM
COPPELL
DEP~ Planning
DATl~: September 13, 2005
ITEM #: 14
ITEM CAPTION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider approval of Case No. PD-186R7-LI, Duke-Freeport, zoning change request from PD-186R2-LI (Planned
Development-186 Revision 2-Light Industrial) to PD-186R7-L! (Planned Development-186 Revision 7-Light
industrial), to amend the Planned Development to attach a Detail Site Plan to allow the construction of a 142,247-
square-foot building on Lot 2Ri, Block A, and a 93,345-square-foot building on Lot 2R2, Block A, totaling 16.51
acres of property located at the northwest corner of Freeport Parkway and ~ethel Road.
GOAL(S):
APPROVED BY
ICITY COUNCIL
ON ABOVE DATE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
otion to close Public Hearing & Approve
]bject to conditions 1 & 2 below
- Tunnell
- Faught
Date of P&Z Meeting: August 18, 2005
Decision of P&Z Commission: Approval (6-0) with Commissioners Hall, McCaffrey, Foreman,
Milosevich, Kittrell and Reese voting in favor. None opposed.
Approval is recommended, subject to the following conditions:
1) Provide dimensions and color specifications on elevation sheels.
2)
More architectural detail needs to be incorporated on building elevations, including the consideration
of repeating the architectural feature at the southeast comer ofkhe 93,000-square-foot building at the
northeast comer.
Agenda Request Form - Revised 09/04 Document Name: ~ 1PD-186R7-LI I-AR
CASE NO.:
P & Z HEAR1NG DATE:
C.C. HEARING DATE:
STAFF REP.:
LOCATION:
SIZE OF AREA:
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
PD-186R7-LL Duke.
August 18, 2005
September 13, 2005
Gary L. Sieb, Planning Director
Northwest comer of Freeport Parku
16.51 acres of property
,Freeport
ay & Bethel Road
CURRENTZON~G:
PD-186R2-LI (Planned Developmenl-186 Revision 2, Light Industrial)
REQUEST:
APPLICANT:
Amend Planned Development-18~
allowing construction of a 142,247.
Block A, and a 93,345-square-fool
totaling 16.51 acres of property la
Freeport Parkway and Bethel Road.
Duke Construction, L.P.
Brace Barclay
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas, TX 75254
(972) 361-6700
Fax: (972) 361-6800
to attach a Detail Site Plan
square-foot building on Lot 2R1,
building on Lot 2R2, Block A,
:ated at the northwest comer of
HISTORY:
Planned Development-186 has a lon~ history in the City of Coppell.
Beginning in 2000, Duke has regularly constructed office/warehouse
buildings, and approval of this addition will basically close out the
western portion of the original 143-a~re parcel.
Page 1 of 5
Item # 4
In the fall of 2000, Council approved a Conceptual Planned
Development allowing seven officle/warehouse facilities on this
property. Also approved was a Final Plat allowing the construction
of Freeport Parkway from Bethel to Ruby Road.
In 2001 Council approved a series of plans dealing with tree
mitigation, signage, landscaping and decreased parking. Warehouse
use parking requirements were md~ced from one space for each
1,000-square feet of warehouse to one space for each 5,000-square
feet. Additional monument signlage was allowed and a tree
reparation/landscape plan was approved. An approximate 600,000-
square-foot warehouse was constrUcted now primarily housing a
book depository.
In 2002, a 160,000-square-foot facility was approved for U-Line,
Inc., and in 2003 construction of a 1,100,000-square-foot building
was approved for the Container Store.
In July of 2004, two more building8 were approved consisting of a
140,000-square-foot building now housing a bank back-office
facility and a 70,000-square-foot building currently being advertised
for lease.
TRANSPORTATION:
Bethel Road is a two-lane asphalt street proposed to be a C4D, four-
lane-divided thoroughfare in 90 feet of right-of-way being designed
currently with construction estimatC, d to begin in 2006. Freeport
Parkway is an improved C4D/6, f~ur-lane-divided street, built to
standard within a 110-foot right-of-way. Them is a Hike and Bike
easement on the western property line.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North -office/warehousing; PD-186-LI (planned Development, Light
Industrial)
South -Minyard's office/warehouse; LI ~Light Industrial)
East -vacant land; PD-186-LI (Planned lbevelopment, Light Industrial)
West -vacant land; PD-185-LI (Planned Development, Light
Industrial)
Page 2 of 5
Item # 4
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan sh~ws the property as suitable
for light industrial and showroom uses.
DISCUSSION:
When the original Concept Plan was submitted for this 143-acre property
in 2000, a total of 2,256,880-square feet of warehouse/office uses were
proposed. In subsequent years, revision~ (reviewed in the HISTORY
section) reflect a total build-out of 2,358,$98-square feet, or an increase
of 102,000-square feet over the original concept. One area of increase
involves the case before you. Originally, there were to be two 92,000-
square-foot buildings constructed on these two parcels. The plans now
indicate 236,500-square feet of building replacing the 184,000-square
feet originally planned for this particular site, or an increase of 52,000-
square feet. Uses remain as officelshowroom/warehousing. The
buildings are projected to comprise 30% office users and 70%
warehouse users. The westernmost building is shown to contain
143,200-square feet and the building at the corner of Freeport and Bethel
is proposed to contain 93,300-square feet. The buildings are sited as
originally proposed, parking is provided where shown on the 2000 Plan,
(see HISTORY section for the reduction in parking requirements to one
parking space per 5,000-square feet of warehouse use), and landscaping
is similar to the earlier concept submittal. This increase in square
footage could be supported, provided all other requirements of our
ordinances are followed, including plaat types, number of parking
spaces, setbacks, building materials, signage, etc. Normally, 20 feet of
landscaping is required between two buildings separated by a lot line.
Since this is a PD, the 18 feet of landScaping shown (7' plus 2' for
parking space overhang on each side of the lot) is acceptable to staff and
will be a PD condition. It is interesting to note that if this project is
approved, Duke will have completed all proposed building on the west
side of Freeport Parkway, a total of over 600,000-square feet of
office/warehouse use.
Because Bethel is one of the main access roads to our Old Coppell
Historic district, we had hoped more detailed buildings would have been
designed for this site. This proposal does tackle some of our concerns
regarding architectural design. Subtle tilings like more articulation in
building facades, additional landscaping along Bethel Road, berming to
soften building mass and additional fenestration would all work to
complement entering our Historic area. Although not a code
requirement, more detailed architectural design would have been
preferred for these two buildings. As Stated above, the architect has
made some effort to address these issues, but additional deliberation is
Item # 4
Page 3 of 5
encouraged. The same comments apply to the building at the
intersection of Bethel and Freeport. The northeast corner of this
building would be much more attractive if .~t (at least) repeated the same
design form as the southeast corner.
The Site Plan recognizes a proposed Hike/Bike Trail along the western
boundary of this property connecting into our trail system. Given the
proximity of this proposed Hike and Bike Trail, a screening wall along
the west side of the building on Lot 2R~ to screen the loading docks
from the future Hike and Bike Trail is being requested. The Engineering
Department is requesting that the cost of ct)nstruction of the 8' sidewalk
along Bethel be placed in escrow with the City. These funds will be used
to construct the Hike and Bike Trail.
The monument signage needs to be indicated on the Site Plan. The
applicant stated the desire to construct two monument signs (one on each
lot); however, they are not indicated on the Site Plan. If these signs
comply with the signage package submitte~ previously, we have no issue
with their inclusion.
The original submittal indicated two driveways onto Bethel Road. The
resubmittal for the Planning and Zoning Commission's consideration
increased the number of driveways to four~. While these driveways meet
the minimum driveway separation criteria, they appear to be excessive
for the two buildings proposed. The qt~antity and locations of these
driveways will be evaluated by the Engirleering Department during full
engineering review.
If the applicant addresses these issues, as well as the concerns of other
departments, we can support this request.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNiNG AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL of this request, subject t? the following conditions: 1) The location and number of driveways on Bethel Road will be evaluated
during engineering review.
2) Monument signage needs to be shown on plates.
3) Provide a screening wall along the west side ~f the building on Lot 2R1 to
screen the loading docks from the future Hike and Bike Trail.
4) Provide dimensions and color specifications on elevation sheets.
Item # 4
Page 4 of 5
5) More architectural detail needs to be incorpora!ed on building elevations,
including the consideration of repeating the architectural feature at the
southeast corner of the 93,000-square-foot buil~ting at the northeast corner.
6) PD condition: a minimum of nine feet of landscaping (7' plus 2' for parking
space overhang) shall be provided between theibuildings and the parking lot
to fulfill the perimeter landscape requirement l~arallel to the mutual lot lines
of these two lots.
ALTERNATIVES
1)
2)
3)
4)
Recommend approval of the request
Recommend disapproval of the request
Recommend modification of the request
Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later ~tate.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Original Conceptual Site Plan
2. Site, Tree, Landscape Plan and Elevations (seven sheetsI
Item # 4
Page 5 of 5
T
/-1 -
! qooM ooeqoed ~.t"~ ~
i ®,.:.;e
sJeeu[6u~ §Ulllnsuoo
! q~o)4 ooeqoed .~ ~ ~
AIX ~ AIX J,,l~Od:
AIX '{' AIX ].UO
l{ .
' {'i
{ I[I j , ~ ~
iii
I jjl
i
U_I
IJ_l
LJ..