DRC commentsCOl'FELL
Project ID SPR-05-0056
Address 944 W Sandy Lake
CITY OF COPPELL
DRC REPORT
Proiect I~ame
COPPELL
West Sandy Lake Road Addition, Lot 1, Block I
Proiect Type
Aeolication Date
Case ManaRer
Proiect Description
Site Plan Amendment (Revision)
10/20/2005
Marcie Diamond
to allow the construction of a combination of decorative metal and chain link fen~;ing along
property lines
the north, east and west
Agency
Building Inspection
FlectrJc and Gas
Engineering
1 of 1
Reviewed By Review Date
Greg Jones 10/26/2005
Jeff Curry 10/28/2005
Chadene La Mattina 10/27/2005
Fire Administration Tim Oates 10/27/2005
Parks and Recreation
John Elias 10/25/2005
Planning Department Marcie Diamond 10/25/2005
1. No fer
Site Plan
Site Plan:
1. The po
easemenl
drainage,
1. Fence:
access to
2. Gates (
Comment~
ting comments made·
acceptable,
tion of the fence shown within the drainage
should be relocated outside the limits of the
~asement.
;hall not obstruct fire lane easement or
fire hydrants·
rossing the fire lane easement shall be
equipped~ith an opti-com controller to automatically
open upor~ Fire Dept signal· Gates shall also be
equipped ~vith a manual overdde in case of power
failure.
tre~s be removed to install fence? if so they
1.
Will
will need t{} be mitigated and a tree removal permit
will be required.
1. Provideidetails on the proposed railings at Sandy
Lake Roa~ and the east property line: height, color,
materials, ~tc. if they are proposed to be over 18" it
could be c~nsidered a fence, which is not allowed in
the front y~rd.
2. East prOPerty line:
· Include ahd label all proposed trees as shown on the
approved I~ndscape plan.
· Include e~(isting trees (type and size) that were
included t~ be preserved in the approved mitigation
plan.
· How will this fence effect the existing tree line that
was to be I~reserved?
3. West pr<~perty line: Staff is very concerned with the
visibility or,his fence from abutting properties, Sandy
Lake Roadland SH 121.
. Label all I~roposed trees as shown on the approved
Landscape!Plan.
· Need to ir~dicate where the proposed fence will be in
relation to He proposed trees.
· It appear~ that there is insufficient width within the 10'
landscapeiarea to support the proposed 3" caliper
Eastern Re~ Cedars, 4" caliper Cedar Elms and the
proposed f~nca.
4. Change file of sheet to AMENDED SITE PLAN