Loading...
AGNREQPH/Staff Rept & Exhibits AGENDA REQUEST FORM THE'CiTY-OF DEPT: PLANNING cOPPELL +~ ' *~.,"<..',"", , . . DATE: November 11, 2008 ITEM#: 9 D WORK SESSION D CONSENT 12] REGULAR ITEM TYPE: PUBLIC HEARING ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of Case No. PD-161 R2-SF-12, Stratford Manor, zoning change request from PD-161-SF-12 (Planned Development District-161-Single Family-12) to PD-161 R2-SF-12 (Planned Development District-161 Revision 2-Single Family-12) to allow a concrete block wall within and a gazebo roof to overhang the 20-foot buffer area, as specified in Section 2(D) of Ordinance #91500-A-177, along the rear of Lot 12, Block A, property known as 709 Stratford Lane. GOAL(S): Ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The following P&Z conditions remain outstanding: 1. Amend the PD to allow this CMU screening fence on this lot. 2. Owner will procure a building permit for the fence, and arbor. 3. It is established the arbor is not infringing on the 20-foot rear setback. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED ACTION: On October 16, 2008, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this zoning change (7-0), subject to the above-stated conditions. Commissioners Frnka, Shute, Jett, Haas, Sangerhausen, Kittrell and Shipley voted in favor, none opposed. ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL: APPROVED BY COUNCIL DA.TE Motion to close Public Hearing & Approve subject to conditions 1, 2 & 3 above Staff recommended APPROVAL. M - Faught s- Vote - 6-0 Tunnell absent . Libby Ball ~ 2008.11.14 15:07:22 .06'00' @Ol PD-161 R2-SF-12, SM, l-AR CITY OF COPPEll PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5T AFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD-161 R2-SF-12, Stratford Manor P&Z HEARING DATE: C.C. HEARING DATE: October 1 6, 2008 November 11, 2008 STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Director of Planning LOCATION: 709 Stratford Lane SIZE OF AREA: 18,981 square feet lot CURRENT ZONING: PD-161-SF-12 (Planned Development District-161-Single Family-12) REQUEST: A zoning change to PD-161 R2-SF-12 (Planned Development District-161 Revision 2-Single Family-12) to allow a concrete block wall within, and a gazebo (arbor) roof to overhang the 20-foot buffer area, as specified in Section 2(D) of Ordinance #91500-A- 177. APPLICANT: Mr. Tony Pack 709 Stratford Lane Coppell, TX. 75019 (972) 471-0524 Fax: (972) 471-0705 HISTORY: There has been no zoning history on the subject lot although a Planned Development district for a 31 lot single family residential subdivision was approved by City Council in June of 1997 TRANSPORTATION: DeForest Road is a two-lane undivided asphalt road contained within a variable width street right-of-way ranging from 40 to 50 feet. ITEM #5 Page 1 of 3 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: DISCUSSION: North: Single-family residential structure; PD-161-SF-12 South: Single-family residential structure; PD-161-SF-12 East: Single-family residential structure; PD-161-SF-12 West: Developing single-family structure; SF-12 The Comprehensive Plan shows the property suitable for single- family residential uses. This is a request to allow an already constructed CMU screening wall to remain on a single family lot in the Stratford Manor subdivision. As explained to staff, this wall has been in existence for over five years, and was only recently brought to the attention of the property owner that it was illegal. Unknown to the property owner, no building permit was obtained from the contractor for construction of the wall. In addition, there is a lattice-work arbor that mayor may not be in violation of code. On examination of documents provide by the property owner, this arbor appears to be outside the 20 foot rear yard setback, but is included here to remove any question of its validity. Regarding the screening wall, as mentioned above, the applicant states he was unaware that a building permit was not procured by his contractor when the wall was built over five years ago. When he was recently advised that a permit was not obtained, he contacted our office and requested guidance to retain this existing fence. We advised him that an amendment to the PO would be required to retain it, which initiated this request. Every property owner on this side of Stratford Lane has a rear privacy fence. Some are wood, others are masonry. There are two elements that make this request unique. One, a building permit was never issued to allow the fence to be constructed. Two, CMU is not defined as a masonry building material in CoppelL so the PD would need to specifically allow it here. Since the fence is already up, has been here for over five years with no complaints, the owner has stated he did not know a building permit was not issued, the fence was constructed inside the property line to preserve all trees within the fence construction area, and the fact that every other home owner on this side of Stratford Lane has a fence, it would seem prudent to allow the existing fence to remain. ITEM #5 Page 2 of 3 Regarding the arbor structure, the applicant has provided staff with documentation that indicates the arbor is at least 22 feet behind the rear property line, hence, only a building permit would be needed to make the structure legal. Staff supports the applicant's requests. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request with the following conditions: 1. Amend the PD to allow this eMU screening fence on this lot. 2. Owner will procure a building permit for the fence, and arbor. 3. It is established the arbor is not infringing on the 20 foot rear setback. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the request 2. Recommend disapproval of the request 3. Recommend modification of the request 4. Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date ATTACHMENTS: 1. Applicants brochure containing various exhibits ITEM #5 Page 3 of 3 CITY OF COPPELL DRC REPORT Date: October 2nd, 2008 Project ID: PD-06-0040 Address: 709 Stratford Lane. Residence: Mr. and Mrs. Tony Pack Zoning change request from PD-161-SF- 12 (Planned Development District PD-161-single Family- 12)to PD-161R2-SF-12(Planned Development District-161 Revision 2 single Family-12) to allow a 6 ft concrete block wall within, and gazebo roof to overhang the 20' buffer area, as specified in Section 2(D)of ordinance #91500A- 177. ( ( ( ( ( l ( ( ( Glossary for items to be covered: 1. Reasons for request for zoning change 2. Landscape Architect Drawing from the backyard of 709 Stratford Ln. 3. Land Title Survey 4. Amended Plat Stratford Manor; Date November 1999 Reasons for Request for Zoning change Page 1. ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Pg.I 10/02/08 City of Coppell: Reasons for request for Rezoning; ( ( ( l (1.) When the fence was put up by Masonry Concepts in August 2003 they failed to receive a permit from the City of Coppell without me being notified. (2.) Also the contractor failed to receive a permit from the City ofCoppell on the arbor without me being notified. (3.) There were no mature trees removed in constructing the wall. (4.) All the neighbors have rear privacy fences (rod iron) plus in addition wooded picket fence put up behind the existing fence by Mr. Spears. (5.) Drainage has not been negatively affected. (6.) The wall and landscape improvements have been in existence in excess of 5 years. Live at 709 Stratford Lane since August 2003. (7.) No objection from the home owners association on the improvements since 2003. ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( l ( ( ( Landscape Architectural Drawing Page 2. P6 1... PACK R [~~f DC: k1 (€ "l.c'\'.i.......TfQM c." CoPl'.El..J.. Ix :~t::t:'h~" 1'cO~. a..,. ~4 ~,., - ~<<; c'~/5; 4tW>"Mi'J..l II' 4'1," n'y," 41' ~ 41 S' It .. It II . . i~t. /ll;u ~'.i" J~_ ~"!>.!!lTi. 1-,":1. ZOO . c~ .1. ---.,- - l'llel'll!:,,"' - t:...."i""" -~h,*,,-" ~..,.~..;...,,' .w...... Df~A',~~: -.MiI..~...,. 1!;,.~..~.-&..~ ift..&t.nr.. ~~.":L~~,,-~c.-.:i":'F+'_"-'~1 -'~'~01'.-,,~~~-;;:-~~.:~t:OC.I':' M I Gi l'4 .. WAI.,,,, ~t,,;~tM: l' 1-'O~''f'1 L;.tI'~ - WALL. ~hOT"': ,8"HJ<t4(~ ( \ ( Land Title Survey Page 3. 'or "LAND TITLE SURVEY" LOT 1 2, BLOCK A OF STRA TFORO t.1ANOR, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF COPPELL, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCOROING TO THE At.1ENDEO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2000034 PAGE 141, MAP RECORDS, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. ' 0.1 110.00' ;..., EL 4 7/- FND 1/2" I.R. EL 453.10 20' NO FILl/NO ---------------_::~:~:.~-- 0.2' 12 11 j.... 't on llQ - EL 455.53 ~ . CD Go It) m llQ Z Co .,; 16.0' Co .,; on TWO STORY BRICK - RESIDENCE .. 709 -0 0.1' F.F. 457.62 EL' 10.9' 11.6' 452.39 - 10' X 10' ELEC. PAD NOTES: 1) ALL 1/2" IRON RODS SET fOR CORNU AS SHOWN HEREON HAVE A YELLOW CAP STAMPED R.P.l.S. NO. 3geJ. ~~ ~H~S) ~~~~~~T~RiH:iR B~~I~~r~~~i:[~.~~..t:.r;L ~i:~~R;~TI5~CH[\~OSN~OWN ~bT~~~ BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE PER PLAT UNLESS OTHERWISE TItS " TO CtftTrn' THAT NO PORTION or THE AIOYt SHOWN NOI'IltTY IS Wll'HIN THE 100 ltM 'LOOD HAbltO .... AS ..lIU""O.. ."""NIT'I'AHEl HO. 480170 0155J __. ..~_ ....., DAng 8-23-01 _ Of' THE FLOOD IMSlJIItAHCt un ".... I. aoavt1' C. "Teu. KOISTElttD 'IlOf'[SSIONAl LANO SURVtTOt OJ' THE STAn or TWI, 00 cun,.,. THA' lltt IIUT H(It[OM IS A 11lVt. COftltE:CT AND AeCUItATE IIV"tt[KHTATION Of' THE: f'ttOIItltn SI<IWN HUlON AS OCTtIMtf[D .., SUMY OH TME OIOUHO UHDER MY SUPtltYISlOH. 1M[ lINn IoND OlMtHSlOMS or SAID NOlt[~ KINO INDICATED lIT THE I"LAT. TH( .....ltOYt..tNTS ARt WlfH$H THE IOUNOAJItS Of mr: ltltOfO(A'TY LINES AT THI: DISTAHets lNOfCATtD AND THUr AI[ NO V1SII:..( AltO "'''''KNT WE.,EHTS. ENCltOACH.,tNT'1, COHF'UCts Of!: ftllOT'ltUSIOH5, [XC[l"T AS SHOWN OH llf[ AIOVt PUT. ntrs SUIYt'l' ",[[1'S Oft [xcnos TIf( ..1tlI1"U" STAHQARDS 12: ~ ~- ~HO~M"~ ~ ROBERT C. MYERS ~ R.P.LS. NO. 3953 ROBERT C. MYERS ~:;~~ ~;~::~;(rA)() ;" ,,; 13 EL_ EL 45.2' F.F. 456.61 455.63 457.49 u <( <0 j... u ,,; <( r:: N U - <( 21.3' ... . ~ CD - ::: Go It) m llQ III 0- 11.0' EL x 455.08 EL 454.94 FNO 1/2" I.R. .'.Boe 4.54.45:' .=1= j)':' , ZQ.' , CRAfttllCSCAl.(: TO THE BE5T OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THE FOLLOWING EASEt.1ENT OOES NOT CROSS SU8JECT PROPERTY: VOLUME 958, PAGE 897 THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO THE EASEMENT RECORDED IN THE FOLLOWING: VOLUt.1E 2000019, PAGE 2105 TNIS SURVEY WAS IltRF'QtwtO rottl ALLEGIANCE TITLE USE or THIS SUMY BY ANY OTHER PARTY SHALL BE AT THEIR OWN RISI( ANO THE UNOERSIGNEO IS NOT RESPONSIBLE TO OTHERS rOR ANY LOSS RESULTING THEREfROlll, NAME JOB NO. OATE GF# ORN. 8Y PACK 56952-00 1-17-03 001043951-TlV SLJ ~ Jutnlytit"ul t;urut'ys, ..iUt". "... PROfESSIONoU. COMPANY OPERATING IN YOUR 8EST INTEREST" 101 EASY STREET GARLANO. TEUS 750<4.2 ( ( I Amended Plat: Stratford Lane Page 4. \ .~ f. ~I - - fl f ': < II ~ ~ ;irl~l~ ~ lHf[~1 " ftid (~~.Ii · 5" .,.::r._ I ll',i ~i ' ,j! t f Z lit ~ I Hi - . ! . 1 ! r 1 ~, I 1 i - ~ I ; I )> ! f ~ i :;/ ~ i ! ~ pn f - t. H kf! ! 1~ !~ i i ! I i I a ! ~ i' tl i ~ ..d~ 11 !. i~ i ~mUt~ i~U~'Hl~ it)i' H~! 0 :;i1:,!g !tUfil;~ ~Hl:'l! q.tfl~ i1fiH; ~LH!l n~ti!:!! ! a "Ii. i ! ~ s. 'm~: 1 Sf 1- - l'l -,!p - if! :!~ { 't ~ 8"0 . ~ :P'i! i t:h;~~ jS-lt~ ~f !jil ';. ~"ii~!~ i It.,- Ifllr.i' I' I W~~~ 4--t=-'. ~'l~ :1; . @i:7!. ! ij~'ilt i l.!lh I ;~f!; !! (If i ~., ~~ ~H~ . , . ~ ! 1': ,n-- ''"' l: is ! I .f~I. ,~~I.I ~~j! ~ ~ , tl I !liif ~ t[si ~ E ~ t .~S~ I ol!~" ~ 8~ - H ~ ~ > ~ ~_ -8~Cla~ ~ ~~ h I ~ ~ ~ AI ~ r ~ji~ ~~ -=Ii g~; !g~~1 ~ ~ ~ ; f ~~~G i ~ ~ qd ~ H g~ 2 H ~~ 8" i .[~~ ~. f " ~ ,>~ ~~ jh ~a !; i -- '-" li~ ,If I' · ]!f Ii, I 11 i ~H ~ ,~. .* . i.: rit !,i H' . Ii!: i~ ~F ,_I T hi d~ ! i - :}JJ~',s,\g\;' 1ColJ/fJ BI8~~~ if<1 ;lli 8" ~t:~~-2"i !~ .H~,;W ~: . ~"~l~ S~ 'll'.'" ~ Jl'i-- [ i ..1" ~ '~f~ . _& ~ l I ~II" I -~., , nB , ,},. i l~ .. 'il ~ll t, . " > ! if, ;11 H~ iH j !~ 1/1 . -i i ;. p' - ~ n ~ ~ d < " ~ 0 i ~ !jj "h .d ~:, ! H.H ~~ , ~ I i~' ~ " 1 ~ j!lj ~a t~ j W~ -- ~ im ~ S I>H~ i i 1m o I k ;:If · I I~ Hf ~ I ,\11l! ~ ~ irfr i iUl : lil~ r'rn ~ r~g · I; I i' If III' i d~! t 51 ~i U1 i ,! HI j! ~ 1~{tf i~ li ':lj.; >~ ~I ~ f;~~: ~.::l !i ~ !ii~l ~~ ~. . Fp~ ~ , q;n_- _ ~ ~ 6:.''1 ~ ~m :!~ ~ Iv ill ~. f'~f _ 11, I · 3ifl i ,f I fj f I r- 1111 . . ! i I ~~ .... ,J.., ;); i i;l~ ;;!ll J '.-',1 ,~. , .. '" ~,'-~I ;.d! j 'It 'I" . J 1.~! -. i UH i 1~~! j;~ ,1;! ~. Wl J ' CREE/( J+ I~ i~;-r ~ " '" \ I~~ ~ , .~ e ~ ! ~ ~I ' I I ~l 1__ :::; ~lt r I ~l ! ~ !d ~ ~~:_ II j ~ '. if -r ~~I.Q!; ~//~, ~ \J' I ,",., '-'- .;, j I. !~S ! H~ I. ~i;~l :~ ,!I ~ PRINC!: EDWARD l....N[ , r~~~ ~~ I ; ~ ~ ';%'~~H~l 'pgi' ~ ".. ~O1> ~: ~; H1!'1,1[ ~k' · [I' j!! :; if,,!. I'! ~" ~ ~; ~.i'*l:~ "[~ ~ [:h ~:~m~higjl~iJ .l~ ,~ ~~ 0 ! ii~:.jlc" H~~ ~ '''~ i'~~~~~'"'~rA' ~ ~ , 3, ~" ~ ~ . i~lj..it! ~i!i ~ i~~ ~laH:;ho! ~ ,I; V~ ~~ ~ ! g "P!p-:'. 'dO ~ ~"- 'hh"g8.'~ : ~,,: !!~ s" if ::0 U~~~;'I'! ;,;~. ,~; ~!~~~~~U'~ ~ ;J'I'H. : .' ~ ~ :~Il~~l ! ;lC>!l .... 11. t<..r':.c,' :"cU.'" ,- 3. ~ i"~ i ; 'jdjl!:'! ~:~.< ~ n~-~'~'~-'~'l~ ~ H' !18 , I,,,,',.. ,-!~ . d. ,.>:8888h ~ ~ . . h~ : ;:.,'!lj' 1<',0 : 'h ijE!H-i:~ - l~, .~! ,~~lcJ:.d !Jil ~ 'Ii lli"":,l! ! 'If p~ ~ I 6 ;ll~!!hf Ht! ~ !~: '~IiiiiH.il Hl-j .~ ~2 I -'111",! ,~- ~ ' , ~, u__ h, .. , II ,,<; {.,~ ~ flllqH.H lWi ;'1 !! _ t ,!llJ'~' h.. - }1' o'Oi"11 '-I Ie,. iz o ~'I.ll":[:" m~ ~i ill,h. r~i ~ ii' ~~ 'll_hdl1i!{~ 1,t"I. .",t; oi l . 'ao';'l'> HI" ,ill" r i i ~r' :! . ,t" "'ij~ ''t''r' I" . ,-,' ,~ ~ ,IHH.}:~. ~~ . H~:!~ j ; i f ~i f ~i M I iI'.ii"'; ,It. ~.i .-~ 1 · ; l'~ g. "r''''-., ~ 'l~tHri'~ ll.l ;ff' [~~ I r 1 ,Id Ji o,",-'",!' " ..1 "0' l' ~ 1< '!;d' ,B;.. 11 1<' ' , t<f il ~ ,H,. <,' ,,;' ~-~-~ :" 'fl , " ,'hld~,! 'i~i .",~._-~! ~ ~ i' I' . " ~ !. 0. ,. i1'i .:;: II 1'1 ~ g.. t; ~ tI : n! ;p ~!h H: ,Ii i l~ ; 111 f! , f' '.' "j"t . -. ff' ". ;, '. ,l :' ~,' .! l[ Page 1 of 1 Tony Pack From: Eddie Pate [epate@masonryconceptscorp.com] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 11 :34 AM To: Tonypack@5starford.com Subject: CMU Wall Mr. Pack, Here is our recommendation for your CMU wall, if there are no city requirements: An 8" CMU wall, 6 to 8 feet tall should have cells filled with concrete and #5 rebar every 32" on center. Bond beam on top of wall with concrete and 2 #5 rebar. This recommendation would apply for general conditions only. It would be best to follow the city requirements or if that is not available, contact a certified engineer. Let me know if we can be of further assistance. Eddie Pate Masonry Concepts Corp. ....'10(. .;~-, "";>l~ 10/6/2008