Structural Evaluation 3091 ~9-PAT
3/ 19/2009
AMERICAN TOWER"
C O R P O R A T 1 O N
Level 1 Structural Evaluation 1
ATC Site Number & Name 309159, Gra evine Lake Engineering ID: 43099011
Catrier Site Number & Name TX-DAL6168, Gra evine Lake
Site Address Coppell Road
Cop ll, Texas 75419, Dallas County
Tower Descri tion 120 ft Andrew Mono ole
Standards & Codes Basic Wind Speed: 70 mph (Fastest Mile)
Radial Ice: 61 mph (Fastest Mile) w/ %Z" radial ice
Code: ANSIfI'IA/EIA-222-F / 2003 IBC Criteria per Section
1609. l. l, Exception and Section 3108.4
Table 1: Eaostin Antenna Confi ration
EL. (Ft) QTY A,NI~NNAS MOUNT COAX (in) CARRIER
, 9 Antel RWB-80015/90 ~9~ ~~g
3 CSS CSS XS4-65-R (6)15/8
3 CSS CSS-DTMA-BRS
120.0 Low Profile Platform Sprint Nexte(
1 Dragonwave A-ANT-18G-2-C _
1 Dragonwave A-ANT-2;G-1-C _
3 Dragonwave Horizon Compact (3~ ~/g
6 EMS RR65-19-02DP . ~9~ 7~g
110.0 3 RFS APXV 18-206~ 17S-C-A20 Low Profile Platform (12) 7/8 T-Mobile
6 RFS ATMAP 1412D-1 A20 _
1 RFS MA0528-28AN (1) 7/8
99.5 T-Arm Metro PCS
6 Andrew UMWD-03319A-XDM (12) 1 5/8
94.0 3 Allgon 7332 Flush (3) 7/g _
i Andrew VHL,P2-180 (2) 0.405
90.0 Flush FiberTower
1 Andrew VHLP2.5-180 (2) 0.405
Table 2: Pro osed Antenna Confi ration
EL. (Ft) QTY ANI'ENNAS MOUNT COAX CARRIIIt
114.5 2 I?ragonwave A-ANT-18G-2-C Side Arm (2) 1/2 Clearwire
Proposed coaa to be installed outside monopol~ -
The subject tower and founda.tion are adequate ~"~r~. `
t ' •w~~a• J iJ~e.4w:;.......
to support the above stated loads in conformance ~
' .
with specified requirements. 3 ; _ ~ ; lE.
?s ~fweea~s~.+ea~aaye~~>x..-.,. . -
{-.:t• 6
t'.. ~rt n r , ~ .
::~i s y'o~4~'vi'.~ . . .
L . 2 . • S., ) .
i.~ "~..1 ~ ~ ' ef { .
C' ( '~s~ trt' 1~*~ . T'' ~
v3~~a~c~f~1.. ~~~...a _ i
f - _ . ~v. ~1~;~ ~y
r~ !,r! 1; ! ~s ~ "y` ~
~ n d ~,:.1_'~ =
~ w~°~_~ ~'=~'3 Z°
I hereby certify that this engineering document was prepared by me
or under my direct personal supervision and that [ am a duly licensed
Professional Engineer under the la~vs of the State of Texas.
' The existing and proposed loads of Tab/e 1 and Table 2 are compared to the tower's current design capacity or previous analysis.
ZThe design wind criteria are compared to the current code requirements.
3 The tower should be re~valuated as future loads are added or if actual loads are found different from those mentioned in the above tables.
400 Regency Forest Drive • Cary, NC 21518 • 919.468.0112 Office • 919.466.5414 Fax • www.americanto~ver.com
~