DRC CommentsPD18-06-000254 Plan Case ID
CITY OF COPPELL
DRC REPORT
Project Name , Lot , BkCOMMENTS
1125 NORTHPOINT DR Address
Marcie Diamond Case Manager
06/20/2018 Application Complete Date
Planned Development - Detail PD - New/Not In Conformance Plan Type / Workclass
PD-242R4-HC, Holiday Inn Express Project Description
Agency Reviewed By Review Date Plan Review Details
Building Suzanne Arnold 06/28/2018 No comment on site plan. Insufficient detail to review building
code issues.
Engineering George Marshall 06/27/2018 Standard Detailed Engineering - FYI comment - There may be
additional comments gernerated upon detailed engineering
review.
Site Plan:
1) The entrances and exits out of the additional parking to the
west will need more pavement so that cars are able to turn in
and use this area.
2) Clearly show what is proposed with this phase of
construction and what is existing. The fire lanes should
already be dedicated by plat.
3) Provide curve labels and dimensions throughout the site
plan.
4) The Fire lanes are to be constructed with Aloft not Holiday
Inn.
5) Double row parking is 9x19' not 18'. - UNRESOLVED
General - Drainage Plan:
1) Show affect of existing drainage area divides and how the
pipe system can carry this additional flow. - UNRESOLVED
Fire Tim Oates 06/28/2018 1. FDC lines should be 4", not 6" - buildings are less than
100,000
2. North hotel is not properly showing the required 'fire riser
room' - minimum 64sf (8x8) with direct access from exterior.
3. Canopies that encroach into the fire lane easement must
have 14ft clearance.
4. All fire lanes for the property must be completely installed
prior to building construction going beyond foundation.
Parks John Elias 06/26/2018 no comments
Planning Marcie Diamond Site Plan
1. Replat will be required to accommodate this additional
land.
2. Verify the acreage and the building size as the number are
different on the landscape plan.
3. Indicate the full width of the driveways leading to the
parking area proposed to the west of the building
4. When parking spaces are “nose to nose” minimum 19’
depth is required – if adjacent to landscaped median or area,
18’ depth is allowed.
5. The northern row of parking (5 spaces) is encroaching on
the required 15’ landscape setback.
6. Currently it appears that you are requesting a one parking
space variance, once the site plan is revised as required
above, the shortage of parking will most likely increase.
7. Note about requesting a variance “to include 6 colors”
1 of 2
PD18-06-000254 Plan Case ID
CITY OF COPPELL
DRC REPORT
Project Name , Lot , BkCOMMENTS
needs to be revised to reflect elevations of this hotel – 4
colors?
8. Include the recently installed decorative metal fence along
the east property line.
9. Max. attached sign, if determined on the façade of the
building with the main entrance, and not façade adjacent to the
street, would be 224 square feet. The two building signs
requested would be 244 square feet, and must be reduced to
be in compliance with code.
10. There appears to be a Limited Service Restaurant, at least
a breakfast bar shown on the 1st floor plan.
First Floor Plan
1. Add the square footages on the plan for clarification – i.e.
what is the size of the meeting room vs. the board room?
2. Does “suite” just indicate a larger room and not the
inclusion of kitchen/cooking facilities?
Landscape Plan
1. The calculations are in error and do not match the site
plan.
a. Parking is encroaching into the required 15’ landscape
buffer along Northpoint Drive, how can the calculations indicate
that that requirement is met?
b. The provided and the required # of trees do not add up.
c. It appears that there is a shortage in non-vehicular
landscaping, but that cannot be determined until the area
calculations are corrected.
2. Consider adding shrubs, ornamental trees and/or
seasonal color along the front façade of the building.
3. Is the “enhanced paving area” the proposed patio?
4. A minimum of 30% of the lot needs to be landscaped
Building Elevations/Signage
1. Max. attached sign allowed if determined on the façade of
the building with the main entrance, and not façade adjacent to
the street, would be 224 square feet. The two building signs
requested would be 244 square feet, and must be reduced to
be in compliance with code.
2. No monument sign is being shown or would be permitted
unless included on the site plan, with elevations on
2 of 2