Loading...
ResponsesMatt Steer From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Asher Ahmed <asher@asherestate.com> Thursday, September 23, 2021 2:15 PM Matt Steer Re: Live/Work Proposed Zoning Change, No Objection Development New Plan.pdf Mr. Matt Steer. Just wanted to say Thanks a lot for meeting me at the city office today. I have discussed the revised development plan with Chris, he gave me a copy of the new plan and fence proposal That he submitted he just submitted to the city for approval, copy of the plan is attached. With this new plan I don't have any objection, as the new plan has a 10 feet landscape setback from my fence, with proposed 5 live oak -trees, along west of my fence, and the drainage issue will be addressed during engineering. The copy that Chris provided is attached. Please contact me anytime if you have any questions. Thanks a lot Asher Ahmed 518 Heath Ln Coppell On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 8:53 AM Matt Steer <MSteer(a)coppelltx.gov> wrote: See you tonight. Please let me know if you have any questions. Matthew Steer AICP, LEED� Green Associate Development Services Administrator City of Coppell, TX 972-304-3559 (office) 469-460-1807 (cell) www.co�pelltx.gov From: Asher Ahmed <asher@asherestate.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 7:18 PM To: Matt Steer <MSteer(@coppelltx.gov> Subject: Re: Live/Work Proposed Zoning Change T filli n � 009L SVX31'113ddOJ LL IiiiOVO?J 113dd00'S 099 i;�iN3Wd013n3a AJOM / 3/UI ! ' �!<l it 1.1 �� r 4 ' ' 011 (WMA ll3dd00 •S 099 0 a 000 0 000 u MQo M aao a° o S5 c n ara s aani � W� x] NNN NN wWV1 O > n a V¢ U Vp U W zo " ND�NN is 0 j iA� Z Q LOS c� OatWNa �SYI .. �w�jH O �twil Z Q e � ii •° $$ `S o O Y y O z Jo 1. 1. U=46 = OUl N x H 4_' SQs 00 b�$W �• woo .j u"iN Z I GG O ^ aVV 1w.� z222py UWa WU Nry�LL W UU� OVN _n�im CIOtA- NW QOWd� O V x At.{ �y 0= V W a y- O 66Z YbCi0�of`�m"n000$Jmvr ;u0sz nawo omOOdxOW UOO x U a ^S NOCL O J ---- -- .cl) w a a o m C r8 .Oi.Z ,CI �i0 N33H3! Utiv00 NO OeYUB G 1 SOO ,40 .I 1 1I i U 4Y� Z Z r 9 i v nr� qn z z iW o^ o 00� o< � N oa Z uN�, off° Q agNS $ CO# �wca� 0 nZ WV Z ZZ1.. U 0 O W�WQ3 OOZ 0Zx 2 i0 ll<�'O &0 aF J LL�Z i�aaa V ZN O aP" Nc, ] O�WCti 1�Q1.Wi ] m50 00Cn=0 5wu 0, n p Z C U m Z O W a Q S+ O L W K a ypza� a Gay �QW o$2� s w",� W iD wVj 00~att O ¢O a Q� yOtC��nYN y1W¢ ZpZ= a 4Q<O m 2 2 U O o mlo`an �o Copp �`�mu '~gym Oadp4N paYw=„g�?� m04ZOaa a N O+7 Unnu �J m NCn O- < C Wom aaZ�O0omZ \0N_�0 m ¢V•uo9aUvrf :u oO�, o�c Q�%�$'m iWIQQW�Q6y�0j� ia°f�U62Y�UmZZmma O0ap=2�o�J Ntz<d 4QV^8q�0Uu`0m�a= a?V� �a %aw.M�uzWo�ro = Gi- w s ���wo N LL>aK�<ojOpWO ZUQrQ 0QUO `wa=6 s��wxaz Q NWwOW Ou-5 ZaJUZA`�OaV-W2UOUkmC uJzzaQ¢irQ0 rcu o oaio 0 &WoaoJ>U1u <N_ Za2W,V4%Az Wrc io < Uin 4rpzWNrQn a .- CO�aOmw7&auja0^0a mu O dYk Fon�i=0oz'<UouiorcocvgiUw4wzu a u O OHO O U � .t rap OJ in r a W J u� O < ,y •- N ✓1 YI IG r 40 P CW0 vi 'd v v 1 Y0 Kra 41 ; rc% W 0A V"2 =V° �":b A a02Gx o cd Y A ,0O POOw° a n x o o a 21 0w p° � d +`3 d ° q obi C w 0 o cd 0 '`O .x '� q 0 1 0.0�' cnk d •iy • 'S ° 0 V > w (ti ^y" o •a a s vy rL4 Vy y lA 4N c o o U N o 31 �"3 N tcd i col u w 'O Ow . W •cq6 p a0°i ro• ay a N o' m WLq °w 0r� a �U ro 0 a �� N E. aw°E. ,`1 I WI F.IP C2kLi 3-w G DOO oNYo9 0 N 3]Hli nrr09 ND ------.-----_alp �i 313tl1N07 7 I v I 1 o� I � � m I kw QF 2 w C�'z uj0 W � _ X2 a aao� �w��ddo0 13 +rnr30K L]tl7N0� i - s T1 D 2 S. COP P E L L R O A D s� m $ IN 1` _C40 0" 0 i t m -- o-_—tat tr 4-- r� ---- . d I!1 CONFRFiE stE°ate 1 1 t 1 g I y Ri � I c I x 9aAl I's £g j j j I z 4' III 11� I 1 1 Igp 1 � >a: I , nry 0 g r- 1Rn IVVV IRA r r lVVV� 1` z t asi 6 § ro I ,�►� W J' I s ly 0 , , 1 1 1 jr .. ., 1 jII ❑ ; �' C� i ❑ 1 ❑ 1 ❑ — 1 1 I I _ � g �oFp I L—.L L :<aoEuteti____�____._,' al , ; I F� `• 1 B' BOARD M BOARD FENCE It OOD 000 OJ*E ttt 83 ,y • ^C1 • Cam'. N ",{+ • N • P. (") �'. • Cam' O •H•+ w Hw kAo Ho Hae w o ro Hn W CD9otoy fD n o o rn in n o v R CL Q. b o w p 'l.' A.. F7 w G p h w y qy " O N h .o ;O N g 1 o n p ru w n d n o ON w li o 't7 d 0 ro o E w 'cY 'c7 cr G �s EE'o a� o x o- G K'. w Q. oy x O o `a �0'r.�srni'sIm� � J CL Vc w" :j H C w o rD t74 =1�d�ladCL V •m a� Q. O O o No-°`RDR� CIA Clord n. ,M_, w o a. ,Y Eo _. �C �elZi A Ojq 2 Om V• � O V1 C D A 1 �,nt SO�ZotZ 00 •,a A O A = pnny nf5 NVOi_� rn> Z '�G� !� \ y}qp;"QlN •Y > O y00t'1 = C1 09sn O v v C rAi n* z o�y�n co' oc"+�i^yotcoo m$N� onz �s"Zr"s�oy 7 0 = oo�n 22 >^^20 �52;G2\m C1� NCp�ps' O ma3m M0 oov: 3N C \!U G Z m Oov »S p�Vp mm V ���� e mtnp ^ tYto to Its rm_•t pO 2z= > o�l tug yea = Amj 3 "Eton 0 ggqN ly 09 O MD %M = y�tP�vmaa,,fFi jAlN�:�tm$Zkt Wm$Ot„o�.,ttt�no m t0 ^>i JI2N pOUO N OP JU(, o v Lo O O O lot n gg • uyCaatl�� 43 .`7 cZ+amprO n r• iCa pp� �t`•„uo�r1 ymNt .. yw��yot�o'�^ low t-Q�'T it � Z~ 2 ;}t• 9� y; V�� A 'o £Nnyo $ FrS (jNU� FN pop 0 mvx10, o` N OCo G ovo Cm' 560 S. COPPELL ROAD LLC LIVE /WORK DEVELOPMENT �1; � ���► � ��I�l�I :E�� � 560 5. COPPELL ROAD i COPPELL. 7EXM 75019 ��J •� �l�I� 13 t fi "to ,WA) Loot Matt Steer From: Asher Ahmed <asher@asherestate.com> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 2:33 PM To. Planning Subject: Reply for the Planning & Zoning Commission. Attachments: PD-213R6 Planning and Zoning.pdf To whom is May concern, Planning and Zoning Commission, Recently City of Coppell invited me for comment for future development, on the Lot adjacent to my home and surrounding my home from 2 sides. Attached is the Letter with my comments and serious concerns about the development, 1.Common Parking facing my garden fence, it's a serious safety concern especially when my home is located at a lower elevation than the proposed common parking. 2. I have concerns about drainage; improper drainage could further worsen the drainage problem which I already have because the proposed development is at a higher elevation. 3.1 am also concerned about future noise issues because of a planned Small park or BBQ area in the back corner of the lot, this corner is right behind my home. Any future commercial dumpster, if allowed, it can also be a source of loud noise. Also attached is the form with my comments. Thanks a lot Asher Ahmed 518 Heath Lane, Coppell TX 75019 Phone: 817-760-8919 Texas Real Estate Commission Information About Brokerage Services Texas Real Estate Commission Consumer Protection Notice Asher Ahmed RE/MAX DFW Associates Direct Cell Phone: 817-760-8919 Office: Address: 500 S Denton Tap rd Coppell TX 75019 i PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: August 19, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 14, 2021 REPLY FOR THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PD-213R6-H, LiVC; V1 kI Lost Creek Addition, Lot 27, Block 1 City of Coppell Planning &Zoning Commission would like to receive your comments on this case to make a better -informed decision. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and return it to the following address or fax number by the date of the Public Hearing: City of Coppell Planning & Zoning Department P.O. Box 9478 Coppell, TX 75019 FAX 972-304-3570 If you have any questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning Department at (972) 304-3678 or email at planniniz(a coppelltx.40v. REPLY in favor of this plan. (� I am opposed to this plan. () I am undecided about this plan. My comments are as follows: The Proposed development Surt ottnding my home from 2 sides, I have following serious concerns. 1,Common Parking facing my garden fence, it's a serious safety concern especially when my home Located at a lower elevation than the proposed common parking. I have concerns about drainage; An improper drainage could further worsen the drainage robiem which I already have because the proposed development is at a higher elevation. I am also concerned about fitture noise issues because of a planned Small park or BBQ area in the ack corner of the lot, this corner is rtght behind my home. Any fitture commercial dumpster, if llowed, it can also be a source of loud noise. Signature: Address: Phone #: 518, Heath Lane, Coppell, Texas 75019 Dated: 08/16/2021 (817)760-8919 MAILED Monday, August 9, 2021 Doqa AtA 0 0 c4 - TO µ caw Mot 2,00P Matt Steer From: Daniulie Madden <maddens85dj@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 7:27 AM To. Planning Subject: Rezoning at Heath Lane and Coppell Road I oppose the rezoning at Heath Lane and Coppell Road. Our neighborhood has a shortage of parking for guests. This situation will be exacerbated if 5 live/work spaces are built without adequate parking. I believe building 5 should not be approved, and additional parking should be planned in that area. Dan Madden 511 Heath Lane Sent from my iPad i nG��7lC' �1�10 F - ��Z o6�cY - octk ik 2vb' 16AY Snr rkti , �16 of to ler W O .i�c' 4 o • WQA& W o wl'T� (torecc (Io4off"14 na ,u•)kY - owfif ec Lco gecY wa<l�cr/ JVV&C Co �iZ i "Y Matt Steer f1tv (Vooty 44ir % W/7 4V/ 9$4 N k 61 5 - f76 V elves - au (144 From, Debbie Elliott <delliott.tx@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 9:48 PM To: Planning; CITYSEC Cc: Tedde Hamilton; Smith, Kay; R Walker; Dana Keys; Mike Elliott Subject: Zoning Change response - PD-213R6-H Live/Work, Lost Creek Addition, Lot 7,131ock 1 Good evening, on behalf of the Old Coppell Townhomes Homeowners Association's Board of Directors we wish to respond to the zoning change request of PD-213R6-H Live/Work, Lost Creek Addition, Lot ,Block 1 (corner lot at Heath & S. Coppell Rd). We have had to deal with these same types of zoning change requests in the past. Most recently it was for the work/live units at the cow of McNear and S. oppe_llR _ Although changes were made and the zoning change was approved for 2 units, we have had issues with parking from these businesses so far. Parking so close to our rest en is neighborhood was our biggest concern then as it is now with this recent request, also in our neighborhood. You may know that our neighborhood is U-shaped with an entrance/exit to S. Coppell Rd from both Heath &McNear streets. We adamantly o��ose this zoning change. If we already experience parking problems with the 2 units already built we can only imagine the enormity of problems we will have with the addition of 5 units on one lot in our neighborhood! Between the business clients/customers' and the residents' vehicles you can surely imagine that there would not be adequate parking on this one lot! _ Providing for parking on this lot for 3 units might be okay depending on how they are laid out. We are very interested to learn how the arking is planned for these units. We respectfully ask t at the P&Z Commission take a more realistic approach to the buildings on this lot and consider carefully the i� families that live in the neighborhood. We loUe Coppell and our friendly, happy neighborhood. Respectfully submitted on behalf of the Old Coppell Townhomes H OA, Debbie Elliott, Treasurer 542 Mobley Way Tedde Hamilton, President ��(� v�@ �, v�. e�� 518 Mobley Way Kay Smith, Secretary 526 Mobley Way Becky Walker, At Large 522 Mobley Way Dana Keys, At Large 516 McNear Z Matt Steer From: Sent, To: Cc: Subject: Matt Steer, and Planning and Zoning: Matt: Don Walker <don.walkerlah@gmail.com> Wednesday, August 18, 2021 3:28 PM Matt Steer Tedde Hamilton; Nan B; Mary Ann Dunkum; Scottie Pearson; Dana Keys; Dan Madden Coppell Cares; Kay Smith; R. L.; Mike Elliott; Debbie Elliott; Tina Beier; RL Walker; Leigh W Walker Rezone Request of Heath@S.Coppell rd. 1. I AM OPPOSED TO the CURRENT REZONE PROPOSAL for Heath@S. Coppell rd. a. because it counts parapes and spaces-blocking-parapes as parkinp spaces, b it doesn't consider parking for an assistant and it blocks garage exit/entry by a spouse. c. Also, consider the access to building 5 - it's a hike. 2. I RECOMMEND REDUCING UNIT COUNT TO FOUR AND creating eal arkin spaces in place of the fifth building, preferably between north boundary and building number 4. 3. Please do not count resident garages and slots -blocking -those -garages as parking spaces. That may meet the standard, but it's ugly, cramped and I hope it will be changed. 3. The goal of creating a thriving Old Town - in itself means people coming to businesses! Not having visiting clients is equivalent to a business park, not a downtown. The Zoning Change proposal, in my opinion, will lead to a string of failed businesses unless each business has adequate realistic parking for Owners, Assistants and Clients, who might then go on to a restaurant or boutique in Old Town. There are FIVE units currently built, from south side of Heath to north side of McNear. They ALL are businesses that have clients - or should have. Thank you for your patience in all our calls and emails. Regards, Don Walker 522 Mobley Way ct Coppell, Texas 75019 972-462-0739 214-697-4580 cell 1 Matt Steer From: Dana Keys <dkeys4@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 3:46 PM To: Matt Steer Subject: Re: Zoning Change for Heath @ S Coppell - Vote NO Please! Hi Matt, Sorry I missed you when I tried calling. I did leave a vm, but wanted to follow up on here as well. I'm more than happy to discuss my concerns when you are available. Best number to reach me at is my cell phone 267-424-0705. Tha n I<s, Dana Keys 516 McNear Drive dl<eys4@gmail.com 267-424-0705 On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 3:29 PM Matt Steer <MSteer@coppelltx.gov> wrote: Dana, Good afternoon. My name is Matt Steer and I'm the Development Services Administrator for the City of Coppell and I am the case manager on this project. Could you please give me a call when you have a minute or two, so we can discuss your concerns and I can walk you through the proposed change? Thanks, Matt Matthew Steer AICP, LEED� Green Associate Development Services Administrator City of Coppell, TX 972-304-3559 (office) 469-460-1807 (cell) www.coppelltx.gov From: Dana Keys <dkeys4@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 1:55 PM To: Planning<PlanningResource@coppelltx.gov>; CITYSEC <CITYSEC@coppelltx.gov> Cc: Dana Keys Mya's iPod <dkeys4@gmail.com> Subject: Zoning Change for Heath @ S Coppell - Vote NO Please! Vote No - Please! Zoning Change Request: Heath @ S Coppell I oppose changing Zoning at Heath and South Coppell Rd. PARKING is the issue. Surely, there should be no change in zoning until we know about the proposed number and type parking spaces planned, versus the number needed concurrently per unit. Please INSIST ON ADEQUATE and AMPLE parking ON SITE The developer proposes increasing the number of units from four, to five. For reference of what could po wrong, please consider the development just one block away, at the other entrance to our neighborhood, McNear @ S. Coppell. There are TWO businesses with only TWO regular parking spaces total: one parking space per business. There is one handicap space per business. Recently, a chiropractor moved into one building. Does anyone know of a medical office that has only one client parking space per patient, and not even one space for an assistant? Did this arrangement get approved without thought for adequate parking? Where will clients end up parking? Probably spilling into our neighborhood? Or along S. Coppell Road. 2 For Heath @ S. Coppell Road: Where will the overflow clients park? Yes -the developer cannot know who might want to buy his buildings. But, the business space is planned. The number of concurrent customers should be a part of the planning process in order to attract a business with matching needs. Please Vote NO to this Zoning Change Request! Thank you, Dana Keys 516 McNear Drive dl<eys4@gmail.com 267-424-0705 3 Matt Steer From: Sent: To. Subject: Scottie Pearson <sgprsn@verizon.net> Tuesday, August 17, 2021 1:29 PM Planning; CITYSEC Fwd: Vote No - Please! S'l o luc# GR% 4USj * 2W ove q I totally agree . I am next door to the two businesses at Mcnear and South Coppell Road. Parking Problems there. We don't need more issues. Please help. Scottie Pearson To Coppell P&Z and Coppell City Council Vote No -Please! Zoning Change Request: Heath S Coppell I oppose changing Zoning at Heath and South Coppell Rd. PARKING is the issue. Surely, there should be no change in zoning until we know about the proposed number and type parking spaces planned, versus the number needed concurrently per unit. We should ALL be completely averse to changing zoning for that property until adequate provisions for parking are made based on expected need. Please INSIST ON ADEQUATE and AMPLE parking ON SITE The developer proposes increasing the number of units from four, to five. The original zoning plans were probably well thought out, without a profit motive swaying the opinions of those setting zoning. But, all too often a developer wants to increase the density of a development to MAKE an ADDITIONAL ONE TIME PROFIT. Then our neighborhood and city have to bear the consequences for many decades! A wrong decon here could last 50 years at least! i For reference of what could go wrong, please consider the development just one block away, at the other entrance to our neighborhood, McNear R S. Coppell. There are TWO businesses with only TWO regular parking spaces total: one parking space per business. There is one handicap space per business. Recently, a chiropractor moved into one building. Does anyone know of a medical office that has only one client parking space per patient, and not even one space for an assistant? Did this arrangement get approved without thought for adequate parking? Where will clients end up parking? Probably spilling into our neighborhood? Or along S. Coppell Road. For Heath @ S. Coppell Road: Where will the overflow clients park? Yes -the developer cannot know who might want to buy his buildings. But, the business space is planned. The number of concurrent customers should be a part of the planning process in order to attract a business with matching needs. No real world parking plan - no zoning change. Please! Thank you, Don Walker 522 Mobley Way Don.WalkerLAH@gmail.com z MAY AN4 JNKN M - S2 wuy - "'4 Z0 Matt Steer From: Sent. To: Subject: Matt: Mary Ann Dunkum <madunkum@gmail.com> Wednesday, August 18, 2021 4:30 PM Matt Steer Rezoning Heath at S. Coppell Rd 1. I AM OPPOSED TO the CURRENT REZONE PROPOSAL for Heath@S. Coppell rd. a. because it counts garages and spaces -blocking -garages as parking spaces, bo It doesn't consider parking for an assistant, and it blocks _garage exit/entry by a spouse. c. Also, consider the access to building 5 - it's a hike. 2. I RECOMMEND REDUCING UNIT COUNT TO FOUR AND creating real parking spaces in place of the fifth building, preferably between north boundary and building number 4. 3. Please do not count resident garages and slots -blocking -those -garages as parking spaces. That may meet the standard, but it's ugly, cramped and I hope it will be changed. 3. The goal of creating a thriving Old Town - in itself means people coming to businesses! Not having visiting clients is equivalent to a business park, not a downtown. The Zoning Change proposal, in my opinion, will lead to a string of failed businesses unless each business has adequate realistic parking for Owners, Assistants and Clients, who might then go on to a restaurant or boutique in Old Town. There are FIVE units currently built, from south side of Heath to north side of McNear. They ALL are businesses that have clients - or should have. Thank you for your patience in all our calls and emails. Regards, Mary Ann Dunkum 525 Mobley Way i Matt Steer From: R. L. <rb180@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 11:37 AM To: Planning; CITYSEC Subject: Vote No - Please! To: Mr. Wile E. Coyote (Genius), We don't Hemore traffic visibility problems created by poor planning, such as at the corner of McNear Drive and South Coppell Road. City Planners put parking space that blocks traffic visibility to the North on South Coppell Road when vehicle parked in the southmost stall. Duh! Perhaps, traffic visibility should be studied when planning corner parking stalls and landscaping? Hmmm... Robert Larsen Old Town Coppell Resident To Coppell P&Z and Coppell City Council Vote No -Please ! Zoning Change Request: Heath � S Coppell I oppose changing Zoning at Heath and South Coppell Rd. PARKING is the issue. Surely, there should be no change in zoning until we know about the proposed number and type parking spaces planned, versus the number needed concurrently per unit. We should ALL be completely averse to changing zoning for that property until adequate provisions forparking are made based on expected need. Please INSIST ON ADEQUATE and AMPLE parkins ON SITE The developer proposes increasing the number of units from four, to five. 1 The original zoning plans were probably well thought out, without a profit motive swaying the opinions of those setting zoning. But, all too often a developer wants to increase the density of a development to MAKE an ADDITIONAL ONE TIME PROFIT. Then our neighborhood and city have to bear the consequences for many decades! A wrona decision here could last 50 years at least! For reference of what could qo wrong, please consider the development just one block away, at the other entrance to our neighborhood, McNear CFD S. Coppell. There are TWO businesses with only TWO regular parking spaces total: one parking space per business. There is one handicap space per business. Recently, a chiropractor moved into one building. Does anyone know of a medical office that has only one client parking space per patient, and not even one space for an assistant? Did this arrangement get approved without thought for adequate parking? Where will clients end up parking? Probably spilling into our neighborhood? Or along S. Coppell Road. For Heath @ S. Coppell Road: Where will the overflow clients park? Yes -the developer cannot know who might want to buy his buildings. But, the business space is planned. The number of concurrent customers should be a port of the planning process in order to attract a business with matching needs. No real world parking plan - no zoning change. Please! Thank you, Don Walker 522 Mobley Way Don.WalkerLAH@gmail.com 2