ResponsesMatt Steer
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Asher Ahmed <asher@asherestate.com>
Thursday, September 23, 2021 2:15 PM
Matt Steer
Re: Live/Work Proposed Zoning Change, No Objection
Development New Plan.pdf
Mr. Matt Steer.
Just wanted to say Thanks a lot for meeting me at the city office today.
I have discussed the revised development plan with Chris, he gave me a copy of the new plan and fence proposal That
he submitted he just submitted to the city for approval, copy of the plan is attached.
With this new plan I don't have any objection, as the new plan has a 10 feet landscape setback from my fence, with
proposed 5 live oak -trees, along west of my fence, and the drainage issue will be addressed during engineering. The
copy that Chris provided is attached.
Please contact me anytime if you have any questions.
Thanks a lot
Asher Ahmed
518 Heath Ln Coppell
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 8:53 AM Matt Steer <MSteer(a)coppelltx.gov> wrote:
See you tonight. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Matthew Steer AICP, LEED� Green Associate
Development Services Administrator
City of Coppell, TX
972-304-3559 (office)
469-460-1807 (cell)
www.co�pelltx.gov
From: Asher Ahmed <asher@asherestate.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 7:18 PM
To: Matt Steer <MSteer(@coppelltx.gov>
Subject: Re: Live/Work Proposed Zoning Change
T
filli n � 009L SVX31'113ddOJ
LL
IiiiOVO?J 113dd00'S 099
i;�iN3Wd013n3a AJOM / 3/UI
! ' �!<l it 1.1 �� r 4 ' ' 011 (WMA ll3dd00 •S 099
0 a 000 0 000 u
MQo M aao a°
o S5 c
n ara s aani � W�
x] NNN NN wWV1 O >
n a V¢ U Vp U W
zo
" ND�NN is 0 j iA� Z
Q LOS
c�
OatWNa �SYI .. �w�jH O �twil Z Q
e � ii •° $$ `S o
O Y y O
z
Jo 1. 1.
U=46 = OUl
N x H 4_' SQs 00 b�$W �•
woo
.j u"iN Z I GG O ^
aVV 1w.� z222py UWa WU Nry�LL W UU�
OVN _n�im CIOtA-
NW QOWd�
O V x
At.{ �y 0= V W a y- O
66Z
YbCi0�of`�m"n000$Jmvr ;u0sz
nawo
omOOdxOW UOO
x
U
a ^S NOCL O J
---- -- .cl) w a a o m
C r8 .Oi.Z ,CI �i0 N33H3! Utiv00 NO OeYUB G
1
SOO
,40
.I
1
1I
i
U
4Y�
Z
Z
r
9
i
v
nr�
qn z z iW o^
o 00� o< � N oa Z uN�, off°
Q agNS $ CO# �wca� 0 nZ WV Z ZZ1.. U 0
O W�WQ3 OOZ 0Zx 2 i0 ll<�'O &0 aF J LL�Z
i�aaa V ZN O aP" Nc,
] O�WCti 1�Q1.Wi ] m50 00Cn=0 5wu 0, n
p Z C U m Z O W a Q S+ O L W K
a ypza� a Gay �QW o$2� s w",�
W iD wVj 00~att O ¢O a Q� yOtC��nYN y1W¢ ZpZ= a 4Q<O m 2
2
U O o mlo`an �o Copp �`�mu '~gym Oadp4N paYw=„g�?� m04ZOaa
a N O+7 Unnu �J
m NCn O- < C Wom aaZ�O0omZ \0N_�0 m ¢V•uo9aUvrf :u oO�, o�c Q�%�$'m iWIQQW�Q6y�0j� ia°f�U62Y�UmZZmma O0ap=2�o�J
Ntz<d 4QV^8q�0Uu`0m�a=
a?V�
�a
%aw.M�uzWo�ro = Gi- w
s ���wo
N LL>aK�<ojOpWO ZUQrQ 0QUO `wa=6 s��wxaz
Q NWwOW Ou-5 ZaJUZA`�OaV-W2UOUkmC uJzzaQ¢irQ0 rcu o oaio 0
&WoaoJ>U1u
<N_
Za2W,V4%Az
Wrc io < Uin 4rpzWNrQn a .- CO�aOmw7&auja0^0a mu O
dYk Fon�i=0oz'<UouiorcocvgiUw4wzu
a u O OHO O U � .t
rap OJ in
r a W J u� O < ,y •- N ✓1 YI IG r 40 P
CW0 vi 'd v v
1 Y0
Kra 41
; rc% W 0A V"2 =V° �":b A a02Gx o cd Y A
,0O
POOw° a n x o o a 21 0w p° �
d +`3 d ° q obi C w 0 o cd 0 '`O .x '� q 0
1 0.0�' cnk d •iy • 'S °
0 V > w (ti ^y" o •a a s vy rL4 Vy y lA 4N c o o U N o 31 �"3 N
tcd
i col u w 'O Ow . W •cq6 p a0°i ro• ay a N o'
m WLq °w 0r� a �U ro 0 a �� N E. aw°E. ,`1 I WI F.IP
C2kLi 3-w G DOO oNYo9 0 N 3]Hli nrr09 ND
------.-----_alp
�i
313tl1N07
7 I
v I
1
o� I
�
�
m I
kw
QF
2 w
C�'z uj0
W � _
X2
a
aao� �w��ddo0
13
+rnr30K L]tl7N0� i -
s
T1
D
2
S.
COP P E L L R O A D s�
m $
IN 1`
_C40
0" 0
i t
m
-- o-_—tat tr 4-- r� ----
. d I!1 CONFRFiE stE°ate 1 1 t 1
g I y Ri
� I c I
x 9aAl I's
£g j j j
I z 4' III 11� I 1 1 Igp 1 � >a: I , nry
0 g r- 1Rn IVVV IRA r r lVVV� 1` z
t asi
6 § ro I ,�►� W J' I s ly
0 , , 1 1 1 jr
.. ., 1
jII ❑ ; �' C�
i ❑ 1 ❑ 1 ❑ — 1
1 I I
_ � g �oFp I
L—.L L
:<aoEuteti____�____._,'
al , ; I F� `• 1
B' BOARD M BOARD FENCE It OOD 000 OJ*E ttt 83
,y • ^C1 • Cam'. N ",{+ • N • P. (") �'. • Cam' O
•H•+ w Hw kAo Ho Hae w o ro Hn W CD9otoy
fD n o o rn in n o
v R CL Q. b o w p 'l.' A.. F7 w G p h w y qy " O N h .o ;O N g 1
o n p ru w n d n o
ON w li o 't7 d 0 ro o E w
'cY 'c7 cr G �s
EE'o a� o x o- G K'. w Q. oy x O o `a �0'r.�srni'sIm� � J
CL
Vc w" :j H C w o rD
t74 =1�d�ladCL V •m a� Q.
O O o No-°`RDR�
CIA
Clord
n. ,M_, w o a. ,Y Eo _. �C �elZi
A Ojq 2 Om V• � O V1 C D A
1 �,nt
SO�ZotZ 00 •,a A O A = pnny nf5 NVOi_� rn> Z '�G�
!� \ y}qp;"QlN •Y > O y00t'1 = C1 09sn O
v v C rAi n* z o�y�n co' oc"+�i^yotcoo m$N�
onz
�s"Zr"s�oy 7 0 = oo�n 22 >^^20 �52;G2\m
C1� NCp�ps' O ma3m M0 oov: 3N C
\!U G Z m Oov »S p�Vp mm V ����
e mtnp ^ tYto to Its rm_•t pO 2z= > o�l tug yea = Amj
3 "Eton 0 ggqN ly 09 O MD %M =
y�tP�vmaa,,fFi jAlN�:�tm$Zkt Wm$Ot„o�.,ttt�no m t0
^>i
JI2N pOUO N
OP
JU(, o v
Lo O O O lot n
gg • uyCaatl��
43
.`7
cZ+amprO n r• iCa pp� �t`•„uo�r1 ymNt .. yw��yot�o'�^ low
t-Q�'T it � Z~ 2 ;}t• 9� y; V�� A
'o £Nnyo $ FrS (jNU� FN pop
0
mvx10,
o`
N OCo G ovo Cm'
560 S. COPPELL ROAD LLC
LIVE /WORK DEVELOPMENT �1; � ���► � ��I�l�I :E�� �
560 5. COPPELL ROAD i
COPPELL. 7EXM 75019 ��J •� �l�I� 13 t fi
"to
,WA) Loot
Matt Steer
From: Asher Ahmed <asher@asherestate.com>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 2:33 PM
To. Planning
Subject: Reply for the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Attachments: PD-213R6 Planning and Zoning.pdf
To whom is May concern, Planning and Zoning Commission,
Recently City of Coppell invited me for comment for future development, on the Lot adjacent to my home and
surrounding my home from 2 sides.
Attached is the Letter with my comments and serious concerns about the development,
1.Common Parking facing my garden fence, it's a serious safety concern especially when my home is located at a lower
elevation than the proposed common parking.
2. I have concerns about drainage; improper drainage could further worsen the drainage problem which I already have
because the proposed development is at a higher elevation.
3.1 am also concerned about future noise issues because of a planned Small park or BBQ area in the back corner of the
lot, this corner is right behind my home. Any future commercial dumpster, if allowed, it can also be a source of loud
noise.
Also attached is the form with my comments.
Thanks a lot
Asher Ahmed
518 Heath Lane,
Coppell TX 75019
Phone: 817-760-8919
Texas Real Estate Commission Information About Brokerage Services
Texas Real Estate Commission Consumer Protection Notice
Asher Ahmed
RE/MAX DFW Associates
Direct Cell Phone: 817-760-8919
Office:
Address: 500 S Denton Tap rd
Coppell TX 75019
i
PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: August 19, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 14, 2021
REPLY FOR THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
PD-213R6-H, LiVC; V1 kI Lost Creek Addition, Lot 27, Block 1
City of Coppell Planning &Zoning Commission would like to receive your comments on this case to make a
better -informed decision. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and return it to
the following address or fax number by the date of the Public Hearing:
City of Coppell
Planning & Zoning Department
P.O. Box 9478
Coppell, TX 75019
FAX 972-304-3570
If you have any questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning Department at (972) 304-3678 or
email at planniniz(a coppelltx.40v.
REPLY
in favor of this plan.
(� I am opposed to this plan.
() I am undecided about this plan.
My comments are as follows:
The Proposed development Surt ottnding my home from 2 sides, I have following serious concerns.
1,Common Parking facing my garden fence, it's a serious safety concern especially when my home
Located at a lower elevation than the proposed common parking.
I have concerns about drainage; An improper drainage could further worsen the drainage
robiem which I already have because the proposed development is at a higher elevation.
I am also concerned about fitture noise issues because of a planned Small park or BBQ area in the
ack corner of the lot, this corner is rtght behind my home. Any fitture commercial dumpster, if
llowed, it can also be a source of loud noise.
Signature:
Address:
Phone #:
518, Heath Lane, Coppell, Texas 75019
Dated: 08/16/2021
(817)760-8919
MAILED Monday, August 9, 2021
Doqa AtA 0 0 c4 - TO µ caw
Mot 2,00P
Matt Steer
From: Daniulie Madden <maddens85dj@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 7:27 AM
To. Planning
Subject: Rezoning at Heath Lane and Coppell Road
I oppose the rezoning at Heath Lane and Coppell Road. Our neighborhood has a shortage of parking for guests. This
situation will be exacerbated if 5 live/work spaces are built without adequate parking. I believe building 5 should not be
approved, and additional parking should be planned in that area.
Dan Madden
511 Heath Lane
Sent from my iPad
i
nG��7lC' �1�10 F - ��Z o6�cY - octk ik 2vb' 16AY Snr rkti , �16 of to ler W O .i�c' 4 o •
WQA& W o wl'T�
(torecc (Io4off"14 na ,u•)kY - owfif ec Lco gecY wa<l�cr/ JVV&C Co �iZ i "Y
Matt Steer f1tv (Vooty 44ir % W/7 4V/ 9$4 N k 61 5 - f76 V elves - au (144
From, Debbie Elliott <delliott.tx@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 9:48 PM
To: Planning; CITYSEC
Cc: Tedde Hamilton; Smith, Kay; R Walker; Dana Keys; Mike Elliott
Subject: Zoning Change response - PD-213R6-H Live/Work, Lost Creek Addition, Lot 7,131ock 1
Good evening, on behalf of the Old Coppell Townhomes
Homeowners Association's Board of Directors we wish to respond
to the zoning change request of PD-213R6-H Live/Work, Lost Creek
Addition, Lot ,Block 1 (corner lot at Heath & S. Coppell Rd).
We have had to deal with these same types of zoning change
requests in the past. Most recently it was for the work/live units at
the cow of McNear and S. oppe_llR _ Although changes were
made and the zoning change was approved for 2 units, we have had
issues with parking from these businesses so far. Parking so close to
our rest en is neighborhood was our biggest concern then as it is
now with this recent request, also in our neighborhood. You may
know that our neighborhood is U-shaped with an entrance/exit to
S. Coppell Rd from both Heath &McNear streets.
We adamantly o��ose this zoning change.
If we already experience parking problems with the 2 units already
built we can only imagine the enormity of problems we will have
with the addition of 5 units on one lot in our neighborhood!
Between the business clients/customers' and the residents' vehicles
you can surely imagine that there would not be adequate parking
on this one lot! _
Providing for parking on this lot for 3 units might be okay
depending on how they are laid out. We are very interested to learn
how the arking is planned for these units.
We respectfully ask t at the P&Z Commission take a more realistic
approach to the buildings on this lot and consider carefully the
i�
families that live in the neighborhood. We loUe Coppell and our
friendly, happy neighborhood.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the Old Coppell Townhomes
H OA,
Debbie Elliott, Treasurer
542 Mobley Way
Tedde Hamilton, President ��(� v�@ �, v�. e��
518 Mobley Way
Kay Smith, Secretary
526 Mobley Way
Becky Walker, At Large
522 Mobley Way
Dana Keys, At Large
516 McNear
Z
Matt Steer
From:
Sent,
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Matt Steer,
and Planning and Zoning:
Matt:
Don Walker <don.walkerlah@gmail.com>
Wednesday, August 18, 2021 3:28 PM
Matt Steer
Tedde Hamilton; Nan B; Mary Ann Dunkum; Scottie Pearson; Dana Keys; Dan Madden
Coppell Cares; Kay Smith; R. L.; Mike Elliott; Debbie Elliott; Tina Beier; RL Walker; Leigh W
Walker
Rezone Request of Heath@S.Coppell rd.
1. I AM OPPOSED TO the CURRENT REZONE PROPOSAL for Heath@S. Coppell rd.
a. because it counts parapes and spaces-blocking-parapes as parkinp spaces,
b it doesn't consider parking for an assistant and it blocks garage exit/entry by a spouse.
c. Also, consider the access to building 5 - it's a hike.
2. I RECOMMEND REDUCING UNIT COUNT TO FOUR AND creating eal arkin spaces in place of the fifth building,
preferably between north boundary and building number 4.
3. Please do not count resident garages and slots -blocking -those -garages as parking spaces. That may meet the
standard, but it's ugly, cramped and I hope it will be changed.
3. The goal of creating a thriving Old Town - in itself means people coming to businesses! Not having visiting clients is
equivalent to a business park, not a downtown.
The Zoning Change proposal, in my opinion, will lead to a string of failed businesses unless each business has adequate
realistic parking for Owners, Assistants and Clients, who might then go on to a restaurant or boutique in Old Town.
There are FIVE units currently built, from south side of Heath to north side of McNear. They ALL are businesses that
have clients - or should have.
Thank you for your patience in all our calls and emails.
Regards,
Don Walker
522 Mobley Way ct
Coppell, Texas 75019
972-462-0739
214-697-4580 cell
1
Matt Steer
From: Dana Keys <dkeys4@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 3:46 PM
To: Matt Steer
Subject: Re: Zoning Change for Heath @ S Coppell - Vote NO Please!
Hi Matt,
Sorry I missed you when I tried calling. I did leave a vm, but wanted to follow up on here as well. I'm more than happy
to discuss my concerns when you are available. Best number to reach me at is my cell phone 267-424-0705.
Tha n I<s,
Dana Keys
516 McNear Drive
dl<eys4@gmail.com
267-424-0705
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 3:29 PM Matt Steer <MSteer@coppelltx.gov> wrote:
Dana,
Good afternoon. My name is Matt Steer and I'm the Development Services Administrator for the City of Coppell and I
am the case manager on this project. Could you please give me a call when you have a minute or two, so we can
discuss your concerns and I can walk you through the proposed change?
Thanks,
Matt
Matthew Steer AICP, LEED� Green Associate
Development Services Administrator
City of Coppell, TX
972-304-3559 (office)
469-460-1807 (cell)
www.coppelltx.gov
From: Dana Keys <dkeys4@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 1:55 PM
To: Planning<PlanningResource@coppelltx.gov>; CITYSEC <CITYSEC@coppelltx.gov>
Cc: Dana Keys Mya's iPod <dkeys4@gmail.com>
Subject: Zoning Change for Heath @ S Coppell - Vote NO Please!
Vote No - Please!
Zoning Change Request:
Heath @ S Coppell
I oppose changing Zoning at Heath and South Coppell Rd.
PARKING is the issue.
Surely, there should be no change in zoning until we know about the proposed number and type parking
spaces planned, versus the number needed concurrently per unit.
Please INSIST ON ADEQUATE and AMPLE parking ON SITE
The developer proposes increasing the number of units from four, to five.
For reference of what could po wrong, please consider the development just one block away, at the other entrance to
our neighborhood, McNear @ S. Coppell. There are TWO businesses with only TWO regular parking spaces
total: one parking space per business. There is one handicap space per business.
Recently, a chiropractor moved into one building. Does anyone know of a medical office that has only one client
parking space per patient, and not even one space for an assistant? Did this arrangement get approved without
thought for adequate parking? Where will clients end up parking? Probably spilling into our neighborhood? Or along S.
Coppell Road.
2
For Heath @ S. Coppell Road: Where will the overflow clients park?
Yes -the developer cannot know who might want to buy his buildings. But, the business space is planned. The number
of concurrent customers should be a part of the planning process in order to attract a business with matching needs.
Please Vote NO to this Zoning Change Request!
Thank you,
Dana Keys
516 McNear Drive
dl<eys4@gmail.com
267-424-0705
3
Matt Steer
From:
Sent:
To.
Subject:
Scottie Pearson <sgprsn@verizon.net>
Tuesday, August 17, 2021 1:29 PM
Planning; CITYSEC
Fwd: Vote No - Please!
S'l o luc# GR% 4USj * 2W ove q
I totally agree . I am next door to the two businesses at Mcnear and South Coppell Road. Parking Problems there. We
don't need more issues.
Please help.
Scottie Pearson
To Coppell P&Z and Coppell City Council
Vote No -Please!
Zoning Change Request:
Heath
S Coppell
I oppose changing Zoning at Heath and South Coppell Rd.
PARKING is the issue.
Surely, there should be no change in zoning until we know about the proposed number and type parking spaces
planned, versus the number needed concurrently per unit.
We should ALL be completely averse to changing zoning for that property until adequate provisions for parking are
made based on expected need.
Please INSIST ON ADEQUATE and AMPLE parking ON SITE
The developer proposes increasing the number of units from four, to five.
The original zoning plans were probably well thought out, without a profit motive swaying the opinions of those setting
zoning.
But, all too often a developer wants to increase the density of a development to MAKE an ADDITIONAL ONE TIME
PROFIT.
Then our neighborhood and city have to bear the consequences for many decades!
A wrong decon here could last 50 years at least!
i
For reference of what could go wrong, please consider the development just one block away, at the other entrance to our
neighborhood, McNear R S. Coppell.
There are TWO businesses with only TWO regular parking spaces total: one parking space per business. There is one
handicap space per business.
Recently, a chiropractor moved into one building. Does anyone know of a medical office that has only one client parking
space per patient, and not even one space for an assistant? Did this arrangement get approved without thought for
adequate parking? Where will clients end up parking? Probably spilling into our neighborhood? Or along S. Coppell Road.
For Heath @ S. Coppell Road: Where will the overflow clients park?
Yes -the developer cannot know who might want to buy his buildings. But, the business space is planned. The number of
concurrent customers should be a part of the planning process in order to attract a business with matching needs.
No real world parking plan - no zoning change. Please!
Thank you,
Don Walker
522 Mobley Way
Don.WalkerLAH@gmail.com
z
MAY AN4 JNKN M - S2 wuy - "'4 Z0
Matt Steer
From:
Sent.
To:
Subject:
Matt:
Mary Ann Dunkum <madunkum@gmail.com>
Wednesday, August 18, 2021 4:30 PM
Matt Steer
Rezoning Heath at S. Coppell Rd
1. I AM OPPOSED TO the CURRENT REZONE PROPOSAL for Heath@S. Coppell rd.
a. because it counts garages and spaces -blocking -garages as parking spaces,
bo It doesn't consider parking for an assistant, and it blocks _garage exit/entry by a spouse.
c. Also, consider the access to building 5 - it's a hike.
2. I RECOMMEND REDUCING UNIT COUNT TO FOUR AND creating real parking spaces in place of
the fifth building, preferably between north boundary and building number 4.
3. Please do not count resident garages and slots -blocking -those -garages as parking spaces. That
may meet the standard, but it's ugly, cramped and I hope it will be changed.
3. The goal of creating a thriving Old Town - in itself means people coming to businesses! Not having
visiting clients is equivalent to a business park, not a downtown.
The Zoning Change proposal, in my opinion, will lead to a string of failed businesses unless each
business has adequate realistic parking for Owners, Assistants and Clients, who might then go on to a
restaurant or boutique in Old Town.
There are FIVE units currently built, from south side of Heath to north side of McNear. They ALL are
businesses that have clients - or should have.
Thank you for your patience in all our calls and emails.
Regards,
Mary Ann Dunkum
525 Mobley Way
i
Matt Steer
From: R. L. <rb180@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 11:37 AM
To: Planning; CITYSEC
Subject: Vote No - Please!
To: Mr. Wile E. Coyote (Genius),
We don't Hemore traffic visibility problems created by poor planning, such as at the corner of McNear Drive
and South Coppell Road.
City Planners put parking space that blocks traffic visibility to the North on South Coppell Road when vehicle
parked in the southmost stall. Duh!
Perhaps, traffic visibility should be studied when planning corner parking stalls and landscaping? Hmmm...
Robert Larsen
Old Town Coppell Resident
To Coppell P&Z and Coppell City Council
Vote No -Please !
Zoning Change Request:
Heath � S Coppell
I oppose changing Zoning at Heath and South Coppell Rd.
PARKING is the issue.
Surely, there should be no change in zoning until we know about the proposed number and type parking spaces
planned, versus the number needed concurrently per unit.
We should ALL be completely averse to changing zoning for that property until adequate provisions forparking are
made based on expected need.
Please INSIST ON ADEQUATE and AMPLE parkins ON SITE
The developer proposes increasing the number of units from four, to five.
1
The original zoning plans were probably well thought out, without a profit motive swaying the opinions of those setting
zoning.
But, all too often a developer wants to increase the density of a development to MAKE an ADDITIONAL ONE TIME
PROFIT.
Then our neighborhood and city have to bear the consequences for many decades!
A wrona decision here could last 50 years at least!
For reference of what could qo wrong, please consider the development just one block away, at the other entrance to
our neighborhood, McNear CFD S. Coppell.
There are TWO businesses with only TWO regular parking spaces total: one parking space per business. There is one
handicap space per business.
Recently, a chiropractor moved into one building. Does anyone know of a medical office that has only one client parking
space per patient, and not even one space for an assistant? Did this arrangement get approved without thought for
adequate parking? Where will clients end up parking? Probably spilling into our neighborhood? Or along S. Coppell
Road.
For Heath @ S. Coppell Road: Where will the overflow clients park?
Yes -the developer cannot know who might want to buy his buildings. But, the business space is planned. The number of
concurrent customers should be a port of the planning process in order to attract a business with matching needs.
No real world parking plan - no zoning change. Please!
Thank you,
Don Walker
522 Mobley Way
Don.WalkerLAH@gmail.com
2