Loading...
Legal opine re Parking Variance tl ~ ~993 '" NICHOLS, JACKSON, DILLARD, HAGER & SMITH, L. 0EC I ~ - ,. :i' ~w~scE w..~c~sos Attorneys & Co~lo~ ~ ~w ~ ~. ~E~ ,~ R~ ~ ~ IH ~&% ~ &~L~ ..... z~ ~ ~8~ ~ PI~ ~ ~ s~ 5~ N~ ~d R~E~ ~Ro, ~ OA~D ~ ~ ~ L~S ~C~ 8~E ~ ~O D~, Tcx~ 75201 OF ~EL F~ (214) 9~4-3334 December ~4, ~3  g Jones e~ 75019 Re: Boston Chcken Resta~t P~g V~ce Request De~ Greg: ~su~t to yo~ requesh ~e ~de~i~ed pro.de ~e fo~o~g op~on conce~g whether ~e ~ning Bo~d of Adjm~ent ~y ~t a sped~ exception or v~ce to ~e p~g req~emenB of the Comprehemive ~ning Ordin~ce ~ ~ey apply to a Boston Chcken Resta~t. For ~e re~o~ set fo~ here~ we conclude ~at the ~ Bo~d of Adjm~ent ~y ~t a v~ce to ~e p~g req~emenB upon a sho~g of u~ecess~ h~p. You adze ~at Boston ~cken Resta~t h~ requested ~e ~nlng Bo~d of Adjus~em ~t a sped~ exception or v~ce to ~e p~g requkemenB ~ ~e Comprehe~ive ~nlng Ord~ce. Spe~y, ~e appoint h~ requested a redu~on ~ · e req~ed ri.tuber of p~g spaces ~ ~y addifion~ requked p~g to be prodded off-site. Se~on 31-8 of ~e Comprehemive ~nlng Ord~ce req~es ~at ~ p~ng ~ prodded on ~e sine lot ~ ~e me se~e~ however, Se~on 31-8(2) pe~ not more · ~ 50% of ~e req~ed p~g to be lo~ted off-site ~der a jolt use/remote p~g a~eement. lnifi~y, we note ~m Se~on 41-3(3) of ~e Comprehemive ~ Or--ce auto.s ~e ~ning Bo~d of Adjm~ent to ~t s~d~ excepfiom to ~e te~ of ~e Comprehemive ~ning ~din~ce. Subse~on D of ~at se~on pe~ ~e Bo~d to w~ve or reduce ~e p~g req~emen~ ~ ~y ~ffi~ whenever ~e ch~a~er or me of ~e b~g ~ ~ ~ to ~e unnece~ ~e ~ pro. ion of p~ or where such re~afiom wo~d ~pose ~ unre~o~ble h~p upon ~e me of ~e lo[ Ad~fio~y, Se~on 41-3(4) auto.s ~e Bo~d of Adjm~ent to ~t v~ces to ~e te~ of ~e Comprehe~ive ~ning Or~ ~at ~ not be con~ to ~e pubic ~terest where, o~g to sped~ con~o~, a ~ter~ e~orcement of ~e pro~io~ of ~e ~mprehe~ive Zoning Or~~ ~ re~t ~ ~ece~ h~p. ~ou~ Subse~om (A), ~), ~d (C) of Se~on 41-3(4) ~t spe~c v~ces or ~s of v~ces whch a ~d of Adjus~ent may ~ ~e ~t ~ not ~ ~clusive. ~m, the ~g ~d of Adjacent December 14, 1993 Page 2 may grant a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, upon the showing of an nnnecessary hardship. Traditionally, special exceptions are specified uses that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance determines are appropriate and allowed in designated districts, if the Zoning Board of Adjustment determines that particular placement will not adversely affect the public and neighborhood interests. Variances, on the other hand, allow owners to depart from the technical zoning regulations to avoid undue hardship. These departures are not desirable as a matter of land use policy, and are allowed only because the applicant shows particular equities agaimt strict enforcement. Special exceptions however are valid uses that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance expressly authorizes in designated districts. Since special exceptions violate no land use policies and are favored as long as they do not cause adverse impact to the public, an applicant need not show hardship. Since, special exceptions relate to uses allowed by a zoning ordinance but specifically approved by the Board of Adjustment for situational suitability, we conclude that Section 41-3(3) is incorrectly rifled "SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS" and is nothing more than a list of express variances or types of variances that the Board of Adjustment may grant when the requisite hardship has been shown. As a result, Boston Chicken must show that the literal enforcement of the parking regulations will result in an unnecessary hardship. A variance will not be authorized merely to accommodate the highest and best use of the property, nor to eliminate a financial hardship. A variance should only be granted when the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance does not permit any reasonable use of the property. Accordingly, only if the literal enforcement of the parking regulations will result in an unnecessary hardship because of the topography or unique characteristics of the property, should a variance be granted. Thank you for your attention in thi.~ matter. If you have any further questions in thLq regard, please don't hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, NICHOLS, JACKSON, DILLARD, HAGER & SM]TH, LL.P. PGS/jd '""xd-cc Mr. Gary L. Sieb Director of Planning City of Coppell P. O. Box 478 Coppell, Texas 75019