Geologic Report-Callejo project WDS
WDS RESOURCES INC.
Reference: West Dallas County Barnett Shale
WDS Resources is continuing to expand its lease holdings in west Dal/as County and the
surrounding area for the purpose of developing high volume natural gas production and large
natural gas reserves in the Barnett Shale. Each well, based on our studies and confirming data
from the Gas Research Institute, is estimated to have reset'es in the range of 4BCF and is
expected to command a premium price due to its mediate proximity to the Dallas-Fort Worth
end user natural gas market
The Barnett Shale is the largest single contiguous gas-condensate reservoir in the state of Texas. It
covers approximately 30,0000 square miles and it promises to become, in the near future, the
hottest on-shore ~ site in the United States. The Barnett Shale has been found to be hi*~dy
productive in nearby Wise and Denton counties based on the incredible perfomance of the
Newark East Barnett Shale Gas Field. The Newark field has produced over 40BCF of natural gas
and 58,000 barrels of condensate as of July 7, 1994; see Dwights' graph. Mitchell Energy
continues to add new wells in the Barnett Shale almost weekly.
Thc same Barnett Shale which is producing in thc Newark East Gas FicM is now known to exist in
west Dallas County with thc top of thc formation located at a depth of 8650' and the bottom
appro;dmately at 9090'. The presence and location of the Barnett Shale in west Dallas County was
confimacd by analysis of Magnolia Petroleum's Tfi~ Estate Number One drtlled, in 1955, to a
depth of 10,231' close to thc intersection of Valley View and Bcltlinc Roads near DFW Airport.
Our Geologist, after examination of the dry samples of the Ma~olia Well, has confamed that our
Dallas County locations have probable natural fractures greater than those in the Newark East Gas
Field. Data available from the Gas Research Institute confirms the probability of this fracture
advantage which is based on the theory of increased fractures due to the nearby Ouachita
over-thrust which rum on a north-south line through Dallas County. Sec the Geologic Report.
Careful consideration of the economics suggest a twenty year life span for each well and, based on
anticipation of higher natural gas prices in the near future and the advantage of end-user
proximity, we can expect each well to gross $16,000,000.00.
Readers should be aware that this reporter, as the Senior Vice President of H-DS Resources,
stands to gai!a~ from the completion of this project;, however, I have reported the facts as I know
n the facts, I do recommend this project without re. servation.
Petroleum Engineer
5025 Arapaho Road, Suite 350, Dallas, Texas 75248
(214) 661-8885 - Fax (214) 661-1618
GEOLOGIC REPORT
CALLEJO BARNETT PROSPECT
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
INTRODUCTION
During the last ten years, the Barnett Shale has become a significant gas
target in the Fort Worth Basin area. The primary objective of this project
is the ubiquitous shale play of the Barnett. The full economic potential of
the shale play has not yet been realized especially eastward toward the
Ouachita foldbelt. The ~'a//e./o Project is the first deep well activity in
Dallas County since 1955. It is located.in the northwest part of Dallas
County, on the JNO E. Holland A-614 survey, of 130 acres. The project is
situated offsetting production and the foldbelt. The Callejo project will,
for the first time, tap this viable source of gas.
PRODUCTION HI STORY
Mitchell Energy Corporation and several other companies have had a
intensified exploration program for the last ten years pursuing the Barnett
Shale in Denton and Wise Counties. The Newark East Field, which the
£a//e./o Prospect offsets, has so far produced 40 billion cubic feet of gas
and $8,000 barrels of condensate from 130 wells (see Dwights' graph).
Mitchell Energy's success has been amplified by the development of a
completion technique that was developed in conjunction with the Gas
Research Institute. Mitchell Energy has completed and stimulated over
100 wells in the Barnett shale using a massive hydraulic fracture
treatment. This completion technique should extend to other areas of
potential Barnett Shale production including Dallas County.
REGI ONAL GEOLOGY
The Barnett Shale is a Mississippian shale deposit during the subsidence of
the Fort Worth Basin by continued collision of the North American and
South American/North African tectonic plates to form a super-continent
called Pangaea.
The extreme eastern margin of the Fort Worth Basin is obscured by
metamorphic, overthrust rocks of the Ouachita foldbelt. This orogeny was
initiated in Late Mississippian time and is approximately contemporaneous
with the deposition of the Barnett Shale. Thesea inundated this shelf area
and the southern Oklahoma aulacogen. The dark organic muds and a few
thin limestones of the Barnett were deposited along this adjacent shelf
area to the aulacogen. The shale thickens to the northeast and east toward
the aulacoc~en.
BARNETT SHALE OF DALLAS COUNTY
Only one well in Dallas County, the Trigg Est. ~'1, has been drilled deep
enough to reach the Barnett shale. The well was drilled by Magnolia
Petroleum Corporation in the spring of 1955. From recently studied well
samples, the Barnett shale in the Trigg well is similar to the Denton and
Wise County wells. The shale is 440 feet thick and is a black, dense, soft,
organic-rich shale. The shale has interbedded thin units of black to white,
microcrystalline to massive limestones and light brown, very fine-grained
sandstones. These beds may also be conduits for better gas production in
the shale.
Fractures were found approximately perpendicular to bedding planes filled
with calcite. Other microfactures were along bedding planes either being
filled with calcite or bedding planes propped open with cavity calcite
crystals along the edges.
The Barnett shale has several distinctive log characteristics. In general,
resistivity values of shales are usually low; about l0 ohms, but the Barnett
shale resistivity values are high around 1 O0 ohms. The Barnett has an
anomalously strong gamma ray count between 150 to 400 APl units a
result of uranium salts. The microlog shows some cross-over which
suggest probable microfracturing.
CONCLUSION
A Gas Research Institute study indicates that a 160 acre reservoir of 250
feet to 300 feet of Barnett Shale reservoir should recover I to 1.5 billion
cubic feet of gas. With over 400 feet of shale in the Trigg well, the
recoverable reserves should be substantially higher with as much as 4
billion cubic feet of gas and a plus for drilling this project. Based on the
development of the Barnett Shale in Denton and Wise Counties and based on
analysis of the Magnolia Petroleum, Trigg Est. '1 well, the Callejo '1 is
an exciting prospect with an excellent upside. Additionally, effort should
be made to reenter the Magnolia, Trigg well.
Charlotte D. Klenk
Petroleum Geologist
10000 Lease: NEWARK EAS~' FIELD SUMMARY Owe§hfS RetnJeval Code: 000. 000. SUMMARY 10000
~ ~poooo
5
$000 ~o0o
9 '~oooo
100 100
~ 1000
I0 I0
I00
0£ 03 04 05 o6 Bp Bo og gO 91 92 93 94 95 96 92' DB 99 O0 Ol
County: State: IX
F~elo~ NEYARK EAST {BAflNE~'T)
Reservoir: BAflNEIT
Op er' a t or:
Oil Cqm: 57633 Gas Cum: 40036,299
F.P. Date 06-82 l oca~on: Date: 07-07-94
Being a trac: or parcel of land situated in the John E. ilolland Survey, Abstract No."'
'614, Dallas County, Texas, andbe£ng a parc of a tract conveyed by Southland Life In:uranc~
Co. Co W.W. Somerville'and w£ge Anna Sanders',filed September I2,1940, Deed Records Dallas
County, Texas, and bein~ more particularly described as foilow~:
BECINNIMG ac a point in the North line of ThweaCc Ro~d, said point also being West 417'/~
feet from the in~er~e~%ion of thc We~t line of CoppelI Ro~d virh thc N~r~h line of
Road, said poin~ alan being the Southwest corner of a tract as recorded in Volume 2]66,
,page 32~, ~eed Re~ords DaZZas Co~n:y, Zeta,;
/~NCE WZST and along the North line of Th~eaCC Road a distance of 924.74 fee% a
~NCE NORTH a diS:ante of 1390.80 fee% a point for corner; ~'~.~
~NCE ~ST a 4is:a~ce of 1345.11 feet a point in the Wes: line of CoppelI Road for c
~NCE S. 00~ 11' 30" W. an4 along ~he Wes: line of Coppell Road a distance of
J "" foe poin~ In the North east corner of a tract as recorded in Volume 2366, page 326
f :Deed gecor4s dallas County, :exes,for corner; ~.~
' '~'~N~'~ST wiSh.the North line of said Crac~ a distance of 2
. . ~BC~o~ with =he Wes= line of s .... 25.0 feeca point for co~er;~
· a~u =rac~ a distance of -150.0feet a poin= for corner;-~,
.' .:. '. ~NCE ~ST with the Southerly line of said tract a di~a e of 192 42 fe
-..'.._' ~CE SO~i:h the most Wescerl .... ' nc · et a porn:
~ELL ~/OR LE)..PE .... ~AL. OXTE 20-D~c=94 STATE .... TX
............................................................. ~E~ OPEk[}[~C ~r~E ........... ~T flP~ITIHG E~P~8[$ ....
--- GROSS PROD.- .... NET PROD --- PRICE PRICE OIL GAS T~T~ DER & INDIR S~ & ADV
Y~ OIL-BBLS GAS-MCF OIL-~LS GAS-MCF O!L-$ GAS-$ REV~JE-$ R~$L~E-$ RDt~JE-$ OPE EXP-$ R Tk~SP-$ EXP~SES-$
EX~N~IAL DECLINE
1995 0 547501 0 438~0 $0.00 $2.25 $0 $985,501 $985,501 $24,000 $15,226 $39,226
1996 0 519644 0 415716 0.~ 2.43 0 1,010,189 1,010,189 24,480 15,607 40,087
1997 0 4676R0 0 374144 0.~ 2.62 0 981,904 981 904 24,970 15,170 40,!40
1998 0 420912 0 936730 0.00 2.R3 0 954,410 954 ~10 25,~69 k4,746 40,~!5
1999 0 gP~Q21 0 303057 0.00 3.06 0 927,687 927 687 25,97~ 14,333 40,311
~OOO 0 340939 0 272951 0.00 3.31 0 901,712 901312 26,498 13,931 40,429
2001 0 306845 0 245496 0.00 3.57 0 876,46b ~'/6 ~65 27,028 13,54k
2~2 O 276161 O 220929 0.00 3.~6 0 851,924 gS1 924 27,56a 13,t62 40,731
2~3 0 248545 0 19~36 0.~ ~.16 0 8~,671 82~.671 28,120 12,794 ~0,914
~4 0 22~691 0 17~953 ~.~ 4.50 0 ~04,8~6 804 886 2~,6~2 12,4~5
2005 0 ~1322 0 ~6105~ O.~ 4.86 0 7~2,~50 7~2 350 ~9,256 12,087 41,343
2006 0 1811~ 0 144952 0.~ B.~ 0 724,760 724,760 29,841 11,198 41,039
S-{~ 0 411325~ 0 9~0~01 W. ~. O 10,629,~H0 10,429,8~ )21,~90 164,231 486,i21
R~. 0 1385965 0 I10~772 AVG. AVG. 0 5,5{3,859 5,543,~59 651,744 85,653 737,396
~kL O 5499~16 O 4~99373 ~O.~ $3.68 0 16,173,719 16,173,719 973,634 249,884 1,223,51~
~XL PUN. ~. O~ ~R F~ ....... P~ ~ P~FILE .....
t~95 Sg44,nT5 $1,2~,~ 0.0 0.6 ($253,725) (~353,725) $946,275 2 11,176,794 40
1996 $970,101 0 ~.0 0.0 970,101 616,376 970,101 5 8,~1,472 45 1,161,064
{997 $941,764 0 0.0 0.0 941,76d 1,55R,1{0 941,764 ~ 6,776,041 ~ 965,767
199~ $914,1~ 0 0.0 0.0 914,~96 2,472,~36 91d,l~ 10 5,884,126 55
1999 $~7,376 0 0.0 0.0 ~87,376 3,359,712 887,376 12 5,160,393 60 665,534
2~ $R61,2~3 0.0 0.6 861,2~3 4,~20,995 R61,~3 15 4,304,781 65 547,635
2001 $~35,89g 0.0 0.0 ~35,N96 5,056,890 E35,896 1~ 3,~dH,71~ 70 445,445
~002 $811,194 0.0 0.0 811,194 5,~d~,0~4 811,194 ~ 3,2~7,9~1 75 355,9~9
2~3 $787,1~8 0.0 0.0 787,158 6,655,242 787,158 25 2,58~,I44 80 276,997
2004 $7~3,748 0.0 0.0 763,968 7,~19,010 ~63,76~ 30 2,080,9~4 ~5 206,709
2~5 $741,~7 0.0 0.0 7~1,~7 8,1~0,017 741,007 35 1,~98,~I0 90
S-~T 10,142,938 1,3~,~ O.O 0.0 8,843,738 ~,8{3,738 10,143,73~ ~ ~ 1~ ~R ..... 12
REM. 4,~04,463 0 0.0 0.0 4,g06,463 4,~0~,463 4,~0d,4~3 R~ LIFE VE~R~TE~ 30
~T~ 14,950,]01 1,300,~ 0.0 0.0 13,d~,201 13,650,201 14,950,201 NPV [ SELE~ ~E-
NET ~/~RST ...... ll.BO
N~ ~/~E .... $/~E $2.95 ~ OIL RR~V/~ ---- ~ 0 Y~ ~[ ~ - ~id-Y~
~ R~E --- $~E $31.03 ULT ~ ~V/i~ --- ~F 17,185 PIY~ ............
RET ~ME/~E -'- $~E $33.98 UL~ OIL RE~V/A~-~-- ~ 0 $ P~ N~ ~IT P~D
OIL ~ ~TE '- BBL/D~Y 0.0 ~ G~ ~V/AC~-~-- BCF 39 8/8 OIL RES ....... ~L
G~ E~ ~TR --- ~F/SIY 74.5 I~T~ W.I. - ............ ~ 100.00~0 ~/~ ~ ~ ....... ~C~ 5,499,21d
INI~ ~OD ~}E-- ~/D~Y 1BO0 FIW~ W.I. -- ............ % 1~,00000 N~ OIL }E~ ........
DEC~ ~TE ....... % 10.0 INITXL RE~ I~. - .... % 80.~000 NET ~S R~ ........ RCF 4,399,373
R~ - N .......... o.o ~[~ nRv~E NT. - ..... % SO.O0000 ULT OIL RE~V ..... ~L O
P~D. RISK F~O~ ---- % 1~.~ T~ & ~U~ ~SK FA~R- % 100.~ UL~ G~ ~V ...... ~ 5,499,214
~EHOLD ~SK FAiR -- { 1~.00 Y~ RISK F~R ........ ~ 10o.0o
-- RESERVE & ECONOMIC RE~RT --
P~PARED DY ........ k~DS (i~i~[B NAME CATEC~F,'Y - City Tax
L~,ER£ST OWNER ..... I~ES~R lite N~E ~S CO~IY --- DLLLLS
WEL. b &/OR LEASE .... ~'AL, BITE 20~C-9~ STi. YE ....TX
FIELD OR RgS~IR - ~RNETT ~LE EF~'EC~[VE DATE J}~-95 O~k~TOR - ~S
......................................................... NET OPE~.TiNG REVilE ........... N~ OP~TING E~ENSES ....
--- GROSS P~D.- .... N~ PROD --- P~ICE PRICE OIL G~ T~.kL D!R & INDIR gU & AW
~a oIn-~ GAS-MCF ozn-~ GAM-MCF OIL-$ G~-$ RUE~E-$ REV~E-$ REVE~E-$ OPR EXP-$ & T~SP-$ E~ENSES-$
EX~TIAL DE~E
1995 0 547501 0 4~000 $0.~ $2.25 $0 $995,~1 $985,501 $24,000 $6,598 $30,598'
1996 0 519~44 0 41571g 0.~ ~.43 0 1,OlO, 1R9 1,010,1~9 2~,~0 6,761 31,2~3
19~ 0 467980 0 374144 O.O0 2.62 0 9R1,904 981,90~ 24,970 ~,57~
199g 0 4~0~1~ 0 33~730 0.00 2.g~ 0 954,410 954,410 25,4~9 6,390
1999 0 ~7~21 0 ~03055 0.~ 3.06 0 927,gR7 927,6~7 25,97R ~,211
2~ 0 3~0939 0 272751 0.00 3.~1 0 901,71~ 901,712 26,498 6,037 32,535
2~1 0 306845 0 2494?g 0.~ 3.57 0 g7g,4~5 R76,465 27,028 5,gg~ 32,896
2~2 0 276161 0 22~29 0.~ 3.~6 0 851,92~ ~51,924 27,5~8 5,704 33,272
2~3 0 ~8545 0 198R~g 0.~ 4.16 0 R2R,071 828,071 28,120 5,544
~ 0 3~91 0 1~R052 0.~ ~.~ 0 ~6~,~6 ~0~,886 28,6~2 5,189 34,071
2~ 0 201~22 0 t~lOBR 0.~ 4.~& 0 7R2,~ 7~2,3~ 29,~6 5.238 34.494
2~ 0 lSll~ 0 144952 0.~ 5.~ 0 724,760 724,760 29,R41 4,R52 34,~93
S-IOT 0 4113251 0 32~401 ~. ~. 0 10,629,S60 10,629,~0 321,890 71,167 393,057
~. 0 1)~5~5 0 11~77~ IVG. IVG. 0 5,543,859 ~,543,~59 H51,744 27,11~
~.~ 0 5499214 0 4399373 $0.00 $3.~g 0 1~,173,719 16,173,~19 973,624 1~,~3 1,0~1,91~
On Mid-Ye~
1995 $954,90~ $1,)~,0~ 0.0 0.0 ($3~5,097) ($3~5,097) ~954,~) 2 11,29~,0~ 40
19~6 ~97~,945 0 0.0 0.0 97~,945 ~33,~d9 9~,945 5 ~,~,~9~ d~
1997 ~9~,3~ 0 0.0 0.0 950,)~ 1,5~4,~ 950,3~0 ~ H,$~,8~ ~
199~ $922,552 0 0.0 O.O 9~,5~2 2,~,7d0 922,~H2 10 ~,9~,~17 ~5 822,211
1999 $~95,dgR 0 0.0 0.0 895,498 3,402,258 895,498 12 5,219,964 ~0
2~ $869,178 0.0 0.0 R~9,17R 4,271,43~ R~9,17~ 15 4,3~,32~ ~
2~1 $843,569 0.0 0.0 R43,5~9 5,115,~5 R43,~9 1R 3,G9~,194 70 4~1,27B
2~ ~18,652 0.0 0.0 R1~,~52 5,93~,~57 ~1~,d52. 20 ~,~)O,~ 75 371,101
~4 ~770, ~15 0.0 0.0 770,815 ?, 49~, 8~ 7$0,815 30 2,111, ~9~ ~
2~5 ~747,~ 0.0 0.0 747,~5& ~,246,73~ ~47,R56 35 1,9~,~2 ~ 156,9~
2~6 $690,~6 0.0 0.0 6~,~6 8,936,803 690,066 BE~ T~
S-~ 10,236,803 1,300,0~ 0.0 0.0 8,936,803 R,936,R03 10,23d,803 ~ IN ~% Y~ ..... 12
~. 4,E54,999 0 0.0 0.0 4,~54,999 4,~54,999 4,854,999 ~ ~IFE Y~~
~AL 15,091,802 1,3~,~ 0.0 0.0 13,791,~02 13,791,~02 1~,~,~02 ~ ~ SELE~ ~TR- ~0.0%
NET ~E/I~} ...... i1.61
NE} ~T~E ..... $~R $2.9~ ~T OIL RE~V/~E .... B~ 0 ~ ~TR R~ - ~d-Vr 105.0%
N~ ~/~E --- ~/~E $21.35 ULT ~ ~V/IC~ .... ~P lV,l~ PAY~ ........... Y~ 1.)5
N~ I~/~E --- $/~R $34.30 ~T OIL ~V/A~-~-- ~ 0 ~ P~ ~ ~T PROD ~TR $1,0~3
OIL ~ BTE --- BBL/DAY 0.0 ULT G~ ~V/AC~-~-- ~P 39 ~/~ OIL ~S ...... ~L 0
GAS E~ ~ --- MC~/DkY 74.5 ~ITAL W.I. - ........... % 100.~ ~/~ ~ ~ ....... ~F
INIT PDD ~TE-- MCF/DAY 1~0 FINg N.I. - ............. % 1~.00~ NRT OIL ~ ....... ~
DECLINE ~TR ......... { 10.0 ~IT~ ~R INT. - .... ~ ~0.~000 ~ ~ R~ ........ ~
EXEMPT - N .......... 0.0 PIN~ R~UE ~T. - ..... % ~O.OOOO0 ULT O~ RE~V ...... ~
PREPARED B'f ........ ~S C~ N~E CATEGORY - Comfy Tax
WELL R/OR L~tgE .... ~TAL. DATB 20-~c-94 ST!TR ....
HELD OR RESLRVOIR - B~3~ETT S~LE EFFECTIVE DATE JAN-g5 OPED. TOR- ~S
............................................................. NET OP~TING R~$~E ........... NET OP~ITING EXPOSES ....
--- G~JSS PROD.- .... NET PROD --- PRICE PRICE OIL O~3 T~IL DIE &
Y!~.~ 6IL-BBLS G)3-MCP OIL-~S d~S-~CF OiL-$ g~-$ ~EV~UE-$ R~E-$ REV~E-~ OPE l~-$ & T~SP-$ IXP~SIS-$
EXmNENTI~ DECLINE
1995 0 547~1 0 4~000 $0.00 $~.25 ~0 $985,501 $985,501 $24,0~ ~,5~
1996 0 519644 0 ~15716 0.00 2.43 0 1,010,189 1,010,189 24,480 ~,g52 29,132
1997 0 467~g0 0 374144 0.00 2.62 0 981.904 9~1,90~ 2~,970 4,521 29,491
199g 0 ~0912 0 33~730 0.00 2.8B 0 95~ .~10 95~,~10 ~5,~69
1999 0 378821 0 30205~ 0.00 3.06 0 927.697 927,~g7 25,978
2000 0 ]40919 0 272751 0.00 B.31 0 901.~12 901,~D 2g,498 4,X52
~01 0 ~068~5 0 24547~ 0.~ 3.57 0 g76.~g5 876,~5 27,02g 4,026 ~l,Og~
~2 0 2761~1 0 ~9 0.~ ~.~ 0 ~51 924 ~51,9~ ~$,~R
2~3 0 248545 0 198836 0.~ 4.16 0 R28 0~1 8~8,071 2~,1~0
2004 0 223691 0 17R95~ 0.~ 4.~ 0 804 836 804,Sg~ 28,68~ 2,70~
2~5 0 201322 0 1~i058 0.~ 4.~6 0 782 ~ "7R~,3~ ~9,~56 3,~03
~ 0 1Rll~ 0 144952 0.~ 5.~ 0 724,7~ 724,%0 29,841
S-~ 0 4113251 0 32~01 ~. ~. 0 10,~29,~0 10,g29,~0 321,R~
~. 0 1385965 0 1108~2 AVG. AUG. 0 5,5~3,~59 5,B~LR59 651,74~
~AL 0 5499216 0 ~39937~ $0.~ $3.6~ 0 16,173,~19 16,1V~,919 97~,~3~ 74,4~ 1,04~,lll
O~TI~ C~ITAL ~. PA~ C~ F~ ~ F~ ~ D~ DISC
~s~ On ~id-Y~r
1995 $956,963 $1,3~,~ 0.0 0.0 ($143,037) ($14L037) $956,961 2 11,122,083 40 $1,430,410
1996 $981,~7 0 0.0 0.0 981,~7 638,020 981,057 5 8,675,34~ 45 1,1~8,914
1~7 $952,412 0 O.O 0.6 952,41~ 1,5~,43~ 9M~,4~: ~ 6,~,7B7 ~ 991,~99
199g $924,5~7 0 O.O 0.0 92~,547 2,514,979 924,5~7 10
2~ $g71,~2 0.0 0.0 871,~2 4,~83,4~R 871,062 ~ 4,~68,641 65 56~,~27
2~1 0g~5,401 0.0 0.0 845,401 5,1~g,87¢ 845,401 lg 3,70R,978 70 ~g5,1~9
~02 $8~,433 0.0 0.0 820,433 5,949,~13 8~,433 ~0 3,340,I1~ ~5 3?4,709
~3 $796,138 0.0 0.0 ?~,138 6,7~5,451 796,138 25 2,~32,255 80 294,823
2~4 $772,497 0.0 O.O 772,497 ~,517,94R 772,497 , ~0 2,119,283 g5 223,739
2005 $749,492 0.0 0.0 749,492 8,267,440 749,49~ 35 1,932,167 90
~ $691,581 0.0 0.0 691,~1 8,959,021 691,581 BEDRE T~
S-T~ 10,259,021 1,~00,~ 0.0 0.0 g,959,021 8,959,021 10,259,021 MO~ ~
~. 4,866,~7 0 0.0 0,0 4~66,~87 4,866,587 4,866,587 ~ ~FE Y~ATER
~ 15,125,~8 1,300,0~ 0.0 0.0 13,825,608 13,825,~8 15,125,608 ~ ~ SELE~ ~TE- 10.0% $5,966,36~
NET ~ME/I~T ......
N~ ~T~E ..... $/~K $2.95 ULT OIL ~V/A~E .... ~L 0 ~ ~TE R~ - Mid-Yr {05.4%
~ ~/~g --- $/~E $31.43 ~T G~ ~/ACRE ---- ~F H,185 PAYOUT ............ y~ 1.35
N~ I~E --- $/~E $34.38 OLT OIL ~V/A~E-FT-- ~ 0 $ P~ NET ~T ~D m~ $1,083
OIL E~ ~TE --- BBL/DAY 0.0 ~T G~ ~V/A~-FT-- ~F 39 8/8 OIL ~S ...... BBL 0
G~ ~ ~TE --- ~F/DAY 74.5 ~T~ W.[. - ............ % 1~.~0 8/8 GAS R~ ........
~IT P~ ~TE-- MCF/DAY 15~ FINAL W.I. - ............. % 1~.~000 NET OIL R~ ...... BBL 0
D~LI~R ~TE -- % 10.0 ~IT~ ~ I~. - .... % 80.00~ ~T ~ RES ....... ~P 4,399,373
E~ - N ........ 0.0 FIN~ ~ ~. -- .... % 80.~ ~T OIL REnU ..... ~L 0
~D. ~ F),~R .... % 100.~ T~G & ~U~ RIS~ FI~R- % 100.~ ULT G~ REeF ----- MCF 5,499,216
~D ~SK FAiR -- % 1~.00 ~ ~ FA~ ........ % 100.00
WDS RESOURCES INC,
October 24, 1994
Mr. Gary Sieb, Director of Planning
P.O. Box 478
Coppelk Texas 75019
RE: Photo's of gas well head and Bunn.
Please find cnclosed two (2) maps and six (6) photos. The location of thc gas well is
marked on both maps, and, as you can sec, it is in a high traffic public a.rca known as Runaway
Bay. This well location is approximately seven (7) yeats old. It is owned and operated by
Enseareh (also known as Lone Stat Cras Co.) Enet~gy and has been a good neighbor to the
commtmity. LE. no leaka o~ spills. I took these photos Sa~day, October 22, 1994. There was
standing watcr that was still contained fi'om all thc hcavy rain we havc had lately. Thc wcll
that Tom Kelly (who is 5'8" tall) is standing next to is sccured via a cyclone fence with ~ on
top. The tank battery is secured in the same manor. Gary, unlike this location, wc would -
landscapc our Burm with sod and shrubs, etc. Thc tan~ we proposc to install would bc ten (10)
fcct tall instead of ~ (15)feet tall as those in the pictm'e. The ~-ago~ and treating
equipmcnt would also bc of low m]houcttc and thc rector(s) box(s) will bc landscaped.
I hopc the cncloscd gives you a better vision and understanding of thc surface cquipmcnt,
as wcil as how wc ~ bca good ncighbor to thc community.
Look forward to speaking with you soon.
vom
Encl.-3
5025 Arapaho Road, Suite 350, Dallas, Texas 75248
(214) 661-8885- Fax (214) 661-1618
Med~d~ C~p
~ 9
7 4
RUNAWAY BAY :~
: -'"~'~ COLLVN COUNTY
:,var ,~' ~_~-- ,z Poin! , '~ ~
~lln~
Krum ",, ,
~ENTOl j ' '
New Hop
bin